What conclusion could a historian draw from examining these two primary sources

History

1 answer:

PIT_PIT [208]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A. Differences of opinion existed about the right of Parliament to tax the colonists.

Explanation:

As seen from the two documents, we can know that the main issue dealt with here is the issue of taxation. Soame Jenyns' support for the taxation of the colonies by the British Parliament is contradicted by the 1776 New York General Assembly. The Assembly rather declared that every free state deserves "[an] exemption from the burden of taxes" that they had not imposed on themselves, but rather were imposed on them by the British government.

These two documents show that there were differing opinions about the Parliament's act of taxation.

Thus, the correct answer is option A.

You might be interested in

The domino theory was used by the United States as a justification for

Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

The us goverment used the domino theory as a justification for its involvement in the vietnam way. along with its support for non-communist dictator in southern vietnam

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

The following characteristics describe which man?

Mariana [72]

Ben Franklin is the answer he was all of these things!!

8 0

3 years ago

What did a guild do for the merchants? set up rules and prices set up shops and fairs bought land and shops trained new merchant

Deffense [45]

The correct answer is the last option. A guild is an association of artisans or merchants who oversaw and trained new merchants (apprentice). They were organized in a manner of a professional association, trade union, cartel, and secret society. The important result of guilds is emergence of universities of Bologna, Paris and Oxford.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why were European nations less prosperous than the United States after World War I?

Tems11 [23]

Answer:

Americans worked harder and were willing to work longer hours.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who were actively opposing to the progressive agenda

Aleksandr [31]

Conservatives were actively opposing to the progressive agenda.

Explanation:

Progressive agenda was formed to uplift the people of all class not just focusing on a particular class of people. It was formed to raise the standard of the working class so that they had some savings for their future. The conservatives criticized the progressiveness.

Conservatives found that it was degrading the society because of its modern culture eventually killing traditionalism. Humanism was placed as the center topic where they felt rights and modernism will eventually kill literature and it would give wings to everyone so that each one follow their own rule not falling into the constituency.

8 0

3 years ago