Answer:
Um You might need to explain further. What's the question?
Explanation:
Question: Provide one example of technical language in “The U.S. Fish and Wildlife” article:
Answer: Word ''biologists''
Explanation:
One example of technical language is the only question that I have found that is connected with the article from your question. Here there are many different articles and since I think that this is the right question to it, the example of technical language is the word ''biologists''.
It is used in sentence: ''Federal field biologists patrol coastal waters and marshes daily searching for wildlife in distress, including thousands of coastal shorebirds, wading birds and migratory species''
- Technical language can be also called technical skills and it is considering the language that is using terminologies that the people who are specializing in a particular filed or area can understand the most.
Answer:
The Eloi lacked most of the qualities that members of the Victorian aristocratic class prided themselves on and considered superior, such as intelligence, strength, and creativity. The Time Traveller initially tries to explain away the apparent contradiction between the Eloi’s successe as the surviving species and their lack of intelligence using the theory of evolution. Being unaware of the true nature of the Morlocks, he theorizes that the Eloi have adapted to a life without danger or disease and have no need for any kind of work.
Wells explains how a human from his own time who is intelligent, strong, and had emotions would be a hindrance to the existing social order of the world of the Eloi. In this way he clarifies to the audience that evolution is just a response to the changing surroundings, which would not necessarily make a species better; evolution would only make a species better suited to its environment. He thereby strongly critiques social Darwinism, which based many of its principals on a flawed understanding of the theory of evolution. Instead, he suggest that the successful species is not necessarily the “best” species. In the same way, he suggest that the aristocratic class at the top of the social order is not necessarily better than the working class, intellectually or biologically.
Explanation:
