1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MissTica
3 years ago
14

The San Andreas fault is an example of which type of tectonic plate boundary? A. divergent B. convergent C. transform D. collisi

on
Geography
1 answer:
Leto [7]3 years ago
8 0
The San Andreas fault is an example of Transform tectonic plate boundary. 
<span>The San Andreas fault is a long narrow valley where the plates that make up the fault meet. It consists of the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate. These plates slide past each other when they move. It is also known as a strike-slip fault. As the plates bump and jam against each other as they slide past each other, earthquakes jar the regions around these plates.</span>
You might be interested in
What does it feel like when you're lonely? I'm asking you, please answer in your own words, this is for an experiment of my own
Mamont248 [21]
It feels like there is no one there for you and that u never mattered u feel so empty and unwanted
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Arctic ice cap _____.
V125BC [204]
The Arctic ice cap floats on top of the Arctic Ocean. The correct answer is C. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Canada's policy of multiculturalism is an attempt to? A.Encourage Canadians to adopt British Culture B.Build acceptance of cultu
dangina [55]
In 1971, Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau and the federal government adopted this policy to recognize the diversity of its people and would accept their differences no matter what race or ethnicity you are. With this knowledge now we can see that the answer would be B. "Build acceptance of cultural diversity." I hope this helps :)
7 0
3 years ago
Help with 1-8 pleaseeee
kaheart [24]

There are many different political systems, some of which can coexist, while some cannot.

Explanation:

On the political spectrum there are lot of variations and options. Some of them are democracy, monarchy, dictatorship, oligarchy, theocracy and all of them have their own unique characteristics. All of them can be divided into two broad groups, left wing and right wing political systems.

A monarchy can act as a dictatorship, and Saudi Arabia is an example of this, or it can be part of a democracy, where it usually doesn't have any real political power, like in the UK.

A dictatorship, on the other hand, can not be a democracy, as both of them are the total opposites and can not coexist.

While it is not common, there are examples, like Switzerland, where there is both representative and direct democracy. They can coexist because in principle they have the same purpose, but can only be practiced in countries that are not too populated.

An oligarchy can not include representative democracy, as they are two opposites, with the oligarchy practically being a dictatorship led by several people  or families.

A government can be a monarchy, and there are many examples of this, mostly in Arabia, but a government can not be an anarchy, as anarchy is a a system where there is no government or any authority.

The theocracy has been and still is a perfect match with the monarchy, as the goals are pretty much the same, they complement each other well, and use the same methods for control of the people. The Arab world

A theocracy, which is practically a religious dictatorship, can not coexist with the democracy, as one of them promotes freedom while the other forbids it.

An oligarchy can be a dictatorship, and in fact it pretty much always is. The only difference is that in a dictatorship there is usually only one leader, while in oligarchy there is several leaders.

8 0
3 years ago
What happens to the quantity demand of labor when government establish a minimum wage
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

Simple logic dictates that when there is no lack of supply and prices of commodities rise, demand must decrease. Consumers of labor will look for alternatives if the price is arbitrarily raised in a sector of the labor market where there are a lot of jobless people. This would increase the unemployment rate. On the other hand, if labor was in low supply, there would naturally be a price increase due to the rivalry for employees.

Explanation:

Since most people are not suddenly lured to work for a few additional bucks, the supply of employees won't alter and those who wish to remain on welfare will do so. For minimal pay, many won't return the labor. The BIG shift would come from the falling demand, though. Many small firms would have to dramatically cut the number of employees they could afford if the minimum wage was raised (as many are hanging on by thin margins as it is). Companies would try to increase expenses (or automate, which I'll get to in a moment), or compel low wage workers to perform more work, or increase the burden of higher level employees. Entry-level labor is meant to pay the minimum wage. then why pay more? Can this individual handle extra work? more talent? Therefore, that employment is no longer considered to be minimum wage. So, by imposing a salary rise, you're telling corporations that workers are suddenly more skilled or able to do additional work. You guessed it, unemployment will increase. The entry-level newcomers on the verge of being dismissed will be replaced with a more senior candidate who is worth the extra pay. Consider McDonalds. Why would you pay a beginning fry cook $15 per hour when you can have a machine that consistently produces the best burger for less money? (long term). Why use a cashier when a touch screen would do? The larger initial cost is true, but it will shortly become equal. Your new crew is reduced from 12 employees to only 2 workers and a ton of machinery. The most automatable jobs will simply be mechanized if you say they shouldn't use machines, which is the fundamental fact of raising salaries. For the business, it is more effective and efficient. Keep in mind that if it doesn't make financial sense, it doesn't make sense. Don't assume that businesses would suffer in silence as a result of this since, in the end, they will err on the side of the law in pursuit of profits. It doesn't function like that. Minimum wage jobs are not meant to be living wage — it's meant to be entry level. Increasing minimum wage only encourages folks to stay at an entry level position for which there are immense consequences for small businesses and automation. A minimum wage increase will increase unemployment among the least skilled workers, and demand for them will significantly decrease in favor of illegal work, subcontracting, and automation.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How do you start a bussiness for teen
    14·1 answer
  • Between 1200 and 1535 AD, was the inca population was a strong presence in south america
    6·2 answers
  • Which major world religion teaches that people will achieve freedom by following the Eightfold Path? a. Buddhism b. Christianity
    6·2 answers
  • Tools and machines used in industry are examples of
    15·1 answer
  • Because of human decisions, the Amu Darya no longer allows all the way to its old destination, the Aral Sea. Where does the Amu
    6·1 answer
  • Which stores groundwater? <br> A. Glacier<br> B. Runoff<br> C. Aquifer<br> D. Lake
    7·2 answers
  • What does the data represent in the following image?
    9·1 answer
  • What geographic landform is not found in Nigeria?
    11·2 answers
  • All of the commandments in the Jewish religion are listed in the __________.
    8·2 answers
  • Select all the correct locations on the image.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!