There are many benefits to using folders when working with lots of files. Here are a few examples:
- You can use folders to sort your files by type, almost like drawers in a desk, so you might have folders for Music, Photographs, Documents, etc.
- You can use folders to group files together into a specific group. For example in your Photographs folder you might have a folder titled BirthdayPhotographs for all the photographs from your birthday.
- As in the example above you can nest folders to create sub-categories. Documents might include folders for Homework, Stories, Poems
- Folders can have different permissions applied to them, allowing you to keep personal files in a private folder only you can access, or secret files in a folder that doesn't show up in the normal list of folders!
Answer: Diminishing returns to physical capital
Explanation: The relationship between the amount of capital per worker and average labor productivity, which shows positive correlation for developing and less developed countries and a weaker relationship for developed countries can best be explained by the law of diminishing returns which suggests that as a country continues to increase its human and physical capital, marginal gains to economic growth will begin to diminish.
Diminishing returns to physical capital can be explained as the decline or smaller increase in productivity observed for every successive increase in physical capital when human capital per worker and technological level is fixed.
Developed countries thus possess higher technological and economic development than less developed and developing countries, hence the observed correlation.
Based on the given statement above, this is an example of
social integration. It is because this is considered to be a movement in terms
of minority of groups where all members of different groups are to participate
in means of having to maintain and create a relational that is social and
peaceful.
Answer:
Historians have debated whether a unified progressive reform movement existed during the decades surrounding the turn of the twentieth century. While some scholars have doubted the development of a cohesive progressive project, others have argued that while Progressive Era reformers did not march in lockstep, they did draw from a common reform discourse that connected their separate agendas in spirit, if not in kind. Despite these scholarly debates, historians of education have reached a consensus on the central importance of the Progressive Era and the educational reformers who shaped it during the early twentieth century. This is not to say that historians of education do not disagree–in fact, they disagree intensely–on the legacy of Progressive educational experiments. What they do agree on is that during the Progressive Era (1890–1919) the philosophical, pedagogical, and administrative underpinnings of what is, in the early twenty-first century, associated with modern schooling, coalesced and transformed, for better or worse, the trajectory of twentieth-century American education.
Social Darwinists still believe the survival of the fittest.
So they believe the one that stuck in poverty are the one that is not fit well within the society
hope this helps