Subjective because the writer brings their own preferences and ideals to the reading.
=The Stanford prison experiment (SPE) was a social psychology experiment that attempted to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers. It was conducted at Stanford University on the days of August 14–20, 1971, by a research group led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo using college students.[1] In the study, volunteers were randomly assigned to be either "guards" or "prisoners" in a mock prison, with Zimbardo himself serving as the superintendent. Several "prisoners" left mid-experiment, and the whole experiment was abandoned after six days. Early reports on experimental results claimed that students quickly embraced their assigned roles, with some guards enforcing authoritarian measures and ultimately subjecting some prisoners to psychological torture, while many prisoners passively accepted psychological abuse and, by the officers' request, actively harassed other prisoners who tried to stop it. The experiment has been described in many introductory social psychology textbooks,[2] although some have chosen to exclude it because its methodology is sometimes questioned.[3]
The U.S. Office of Naval Research[4] funded the experiment as an investigation into the causes of difficulties between guards and prisoners in the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps. Certain portions of it were filmed, and excerpts of footage are publicly available.
Some of the experiment's findings have been called into question, and the experiment has been criticized for unscientific methodology and possible fraud.[5][6] Whereas the experiment purported to show that prison guards instinctively embraced sadistic and authoritarian personalities, Zimbardo actually instructed the "guards" to exert psychological control over the "prisoners". Critics also noted that some of the participants behaved in a way that would help the study, so that, as one "guard" later put it, "the researchers would have something to work with," which is known as demand characteristics. Variants of the experiment have been performed by other researchers, but none of these attempts have replicated the results of the SPE.
Hope this helps and hope this is whst you are looking for!
Answer:
In the article 'Better training for new drivers' the author claims that if better training is provided to drivers, then the chances of accidents can be reduced overall.
In its counterpart, some people believe that young drivers should be able to drive as soon as possible and not much of their time should be wasted on driving teaching.
The author provides sufficient evidences for his claim by providing statistics of death and accident rates of teenagers. He also provides statistics in which he explains that about 70% of the teenagers face severe accidental injuries because they do not wear seat belt. With the help of statistics, he also explains that about 27% of the teenagers drive even when they have consumed alcohol and face accidents.
All his evidences are enough to support his claim.
Answer:
A primary source is a first-hand or contemporary account of an event or topic.
Secondary sources are texts based on primary sources, and involve generalization, analysis, synthesis, interpretation, or evaluation.
A primary source gives you direct access to the subject of your research. Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers.
Examples include journal articles, reviews, and academic books. A secondary source describes, interprets, or synthesizes primary sources.
Explanation:
Please mark me brainliest and hope this helped :D
