Strict constructionism/interpretation refers to the practice of applying a narrow, or 'strict', interpretation of the U.S. Constitution or other legal texts. Key examples and cases that serve to illustrate strict constructionism include Thomas Jefferson's opposition to Alexander Hamilton's idea of a national bank, the Scott v.
<span>Without amendments, we are stuck with what some guys thought would be nice over 200 years ago. A few things we took out of the constitution by amendment: Slaves count as 3/5 of a person. The incoming president must wait five months after being elected to take office. Electoral college for senators (now--can we get rid of it for presidents?) We also filled in holes that were evident in the constitution, and clarified more rights that people have. The Bill of Rights is all amendments--they wanted a working government first before they decided what limits to put on it. Women were allowed to vote. Someone figured out that if a president becomes sick but doesn't die, the government is in limbo, because the VP couldn't just do the President's job until an amendment was passed saying how it would be determined the Pres was too sick to do his job. Allowing amendments allows mistakes made by the writers of the constitution to be corrected, and for changes they didn't forsee to be allowable.</span>
The correct answer is : China had been closed to most foreigners.
Deng opened China to foreign investment, the global market and limited private competition. He is credited with the development of China in one of the fastest growing economies in the world for more than 30 years and the rising standard of living of hundreds of millions of Chinese.
The answer would be "Its wealth and individualism promoted artistic growth." <span>The banking industry went under massive organization and several new banking families rose to the fore. </span><span>Along with these families the territory in which they resided also profited with them. </span>
