True
Airbags, when activated, give off too high amounts of force than a child could withstand. They could break the child's ribs or other body parts if it goes off, or give them a concussion. Therefore, it is best to either turn the airbag feature off or, better yet, have the child sit in the back seat.
She was known for literature.
have a nice day brainliest would be fantastic
Answer:The answer is either A or B
Explanation:because in both answers you are comparing two things
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
Answer:
None of the above
Explanation:
The technique, which includes placing shows at the same time every day so that people get into the habit of watching them, is called strip programming or stripping. Programs broadcast this way are given a regular time slot during the week. This ensures consistency and coherency, as consistent content is delivered to the targeted audience at the time the broadcasters predict that they will be listening to or watching their programs.
Hammocking a technique that includes the scheduling of an unpopular program between two popular programs, so that the viewers are more likely to watch it.
Tentpoling is a technique that broadcasters use to draw the audience to unknown programs by placing them on either side of a well-known program.
Sipping as a scheduling strategy does not exist.
