Answer:
the family life/growth can be sorta compared to how weve had to be in quarantine with our families and getting closer or growing apart, and there was a lot of prejudice going on in the book just like today with
Answer:
In the essay piece "Survivor's Guilt: The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt," published by author Nancy Sherman, she investigates the sentiments of guilt that servicemembers and women face after being exposed to traumatic events. They must survive an incidence in which they are deemed to be responsible for the death or injury of another person or group of people in order to be eligible for parole. Furthermore, they are haunted by feelings of guilt because of their incapacity to save them from themselves.
"Survivor guilt" is a negative emotion that emerges when a person has survived a difficult situation of any type, such as a natural disaster. In the aftermath of a sad occurrence, survivors may have overwhelming emotions of guilt that are difficult to manage. Soldiers' moral recovery is dependent on their capacity to forgive themselves and not be concerned with their own suffering, as described above.
According to the article "The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt," survivors may experience guilt even though they have done nothing wrong. This is since it happens much too often, and people who have done wrong should feel bad about themselves. When dealing with survivor guilt after a natural disaster or terrorist attack, there is a way to produce a solution that both people can agree on.
As evidence, below are a few notable points. Some examples include the following, all of which should be considered:
The fact that one has survived a natural disaster may make one feel guilty about his or her situation.
It is one way to share some of your bad luck: Sob uncontrollably in sorrow over your sins.
It is only through the mix of self-forgiveness and self-apathy that soldiers' morale may be restored.
Finding the perfect balance between a soldier's work and personal life might be difficult for him or her.
Explanation:
(305 words)
O% plagiarism in my answer. Please change words to make it your own work. :)
Answer:
Scapegoating is the practice of singling out a person or group for unmerited blame and consequent negative treatment. Herd mentality describes how people can be influenced by their peers to adopt certain behaviors on a largely emotional, rather than rational, basis. So yes, in a way, there is a connection between the two simply based on their definitions.
Explanation:
Let’s use bullying as an example:
Jason and his “friends” are outside after lunch and one of his friends begins to pick on a younger, defenseless kid because they’re wearing glasses. Then, Jason and his other friends (that were not previously butting in) join the friend’s berating because Jason and his friends think it’ll make them look cool and sound intimidating, even though it is a very irrational idea.
Now, you have scapegoating. Luke singles out and tortures a kid because they’re not wearing the “most in” shoes. See the similarities?
Hope this helps!
