1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler [38]
3 years ago
9

Do you think the punishment for people who are in a position of authority (such as teachers, coaches, preachers) should be harsh

er than for the regular population if they commit a crime which they are more likely to get away with because of their position? Why or why not?
Law
1 answer:
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

I think that their punishment should be harsher because they are expected to do the right thing in the positions that are given to them so if they disobey they should be punish severely because they are not above the law.

You might be interested in
10 points
Nataliya [291]

Answer:

- recommend that the state supreme court decide the fate of the bill.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hello! Please click on the link and get me to 99% please!
matrenka [14]

Answer:

cool

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read the example in the reference image. This is an example of the government doing what?
stepan [7]

Answer:

B: keeping foo safe

Explanation:

I guess i don't <em>need</em> an explanation, right?

5 0
3 years ago
The individual who proposed principles such as the power to govern should be from
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

help

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What are three historic landmark cases decided by the Supreme Court? Please name each case and briefly state the topic it dealt
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Issue: Who can ultimately decide what the law is?

Result: "It is explicitly the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is."

Importance: This decision gave the Court the ability to strike down laws on the grounds that they are unconstitutional (a power called judicial review).

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Issue: Can Congress establish a national bank, and if so, can a state tax this bank?

Result: The Court held that Congress had implied powers to establish a national bank under the "necessary and proper" clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court also determined that United States laws trump state laws and consequently, a state could not tax the national bank.

Importance: The McCulloch decision established two important principles for constitutional law that continue today: implied powers and federal supremacy

ABA Groups Division for Public Education Programs Constitution Day

Landmark United States Supreme Court Cases

Share:

    

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Issue: Who can ultimately decide what the law is?

Result: "It is explicitly the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is."

Importance: This decision gave the Court the ability to strike down laws on the grounds that they are unconstitutional (a power called judicial review).

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Issue: Can Congress establish a national bank, and if so, can a state tax this bank?

Result: The Court held that Congress had implied powers to establish a national bank under the "necessary and proper" clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court also determined that United States laws trump state laws and consequently, a state could not tax the national bank.

Importance: The McCulloch decision established two important principles for constitutional law that continue today: implied powers and federal supremacy.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

Issue: Can states pass laws that challenge the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce?

Result: The Court held that it is the role of the federal government to regulate commerce and that state governments cannot develop their own commerce-regulating laws. Further, the Court created a wide definition for “commerce,” reasoning that the term encompassed more than just selling and buying. In this case, the Court determined that regulating water navigation was in fact an act that regulated commerce.

Importance: The impact of Gibbons is still felt today as it gives the federal government a much-broader base to regulate economic transactions.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Item 3<br> Which shows 8,713,860 rounded to the nearest million?
    9·1 answer
  • How is the role of a prison guard relevant to the court and judicial process?
    6·2 answers
  • What do you mean by mandamus?<br><br>Will mark brainliest ( just have 2 more )<br><br>Thank you​
    6·2 answers
  • 3. What is the difference between the Speaker of the House and the president pro
    8·1 answer
  • 13. About how many teen drivers were killed in motor vehicle crahes in the
    12·1 answer
  • 1. what is public opinion ?
    14·1 answer
  • What better Xbox,ps4,pc
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is CORRECT regarding deciding whether an alcohol sale is legal?
    15·1 answer
  • How Do I Poop in my pants?
    9·2 answers
  • Project: Create an Employment Dispute and Resolve It through Arbitration
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!