1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr1967 [171]
2 years ago
8

What is the most likely venue for the case of a builder in MD working on renovations for a tenent in NY then hires a contractor

in MD to help but then doesnt complete work as promised on said day
Law
1 answer:
lisov135 [29]2 years ago
7 0
The builder is at fault, however if there is no legal document that he has signed to say that he would complete the work and help them, then he isn’t liable.
You might be interested in
Types of jurisdiction include which of the following?​
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

All of these choices are correct.

Explanation:

<em>- In Personam Jurisdiction </em>

In personam jurisdiction (or personal jurisdiction) refers to courts' authority over particular entities, and their liabilities & rights.

<em>- In Rem Jurisdiction</em>

In rem jurisdiction refers to courts' authority over property within a county, district, or state.

<em>- Original and Appellate Jurisdiction</em>

Original jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review a case, and appellate jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review decisions adjudicated by lower courts.

6 0
2 years ago
What is an international agreement that requires senate approval
poizon [28]
An international agreement that requires senate approval is a treaty.
8 0
3 years ago
Three years ago, the state of Nevada passed a law making the recreational use of marijuana legal. Yet such use of marijuana is a
Oksanka [162]

The basis on which Nevada had the authority to <u>override a federal law</u> is <u>Option A</u>. ... widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law.

<h3>Can a state override a federal law?</h3>

The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution is Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

The Supremacy Clause means that the federal constitution and laws take precedence over state laws and constitutions.

<h3>Answer Options:</h3>

A. Nevada doesn’t have the authority to override federal law. Federal law stands supreme. Yet, the force of widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law. We also saw this effect during Prohibition in the 1920s – which showed that even constitutional law has limits if a substantial part of the population does not support that law.

B. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has the statutory authority to allow exceptions to federal drug laws.

C. States have precedence over federal authorities on matters of recreational drug use.

D. The executive authority of the governor of Nevada makes such laws exceptions to federal prohibitions. By virtue of signing the legislation making marijuana legal, Governor Brian Sandoval’s executive authority gave pot’s legal possession precedence over federal law.

Thus, the basis on which Nevada had the authority to <u>override a federal law</u> is <u>Option A</u>. ... widespread public acceptance and general use of marijuana has made it difficult to enforce federal law.

Learn more about the Supremacy Clause at brainly.com/question/12959391

6 0
2 years ago
If you were a prosecuting attorney, and you KNEW FOR FACT that the defendant had committed a crime, would you commit misconduct
Pepsi [2]

As the prosecuting attorney,  your role is to defend the defendant in regards to the case and even if they had committed a crime, you have to make sure that they are not proven guilty or they are acquitted.

To some extent, the level of crime or crime type matter because some prosecuting attorney will let their clients go if it a petty crime but when it is a crime such as murder, misappropriation of funds, they may never compromise.

<h3>What is this case about?</h3>

If you known that it is a huge crime and your conscience cannot allow you to let the man go so that he will not do it again, you can tell the opposition lawyer anonymously but this may jeopardize your law career if caught.

The right thing to do is to step down from been the prosecuting attorney and then you can be free from that guilt of betrayal to yourself and to the defendant and then one can properly submit the evidence to the  opposition lawyer.

Learn more about prosecuting attorney from

brainly.com/question/11589445

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
The Australian legal system isn't very fair. Why are there problems with having a fair hearing and why is everyone not equal in
meriva

Answer:

-There is so much discrimination.

-If it's a jury most people just think guilty as they don't know the law

-Many people can't afford a good lawyer

-Many people have an inadequate knowledge of the law

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Roles john locke in devepment constitutional law
    13·2 answers
  • Hamburger in stomach contents.
    5·1 answer
  • How do you think the right to veto rules or laws helped the<br> common people of Rome?
    13·1 answer
  • Should sexual offenders be granted probation?
    5·2 answers
  • 1 What does "You have the right to remain silent" mean? A You have the right to free speech B You don't have to testify against
    13·1 answer
  • Who is a nationalist
    15·2 answers
  • During the 1950s, psychology and social psychological research played key roles in the new focus on prisoner's health and well-b
    8·1 answer
  • I need help answering this.
    15·1 answer
  • Please help with this question
    15·2 answers
  • What is the penalty for sedition in the united states.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!