Answer:
Supreme Court justices need a healthy respect for past precedents. But sometimes, precedent is so bad it simply has to be overturned.
The court did just that last month in the case of Knick v. Township of Scott. The court delivered a victory for champions of property rights by overturning a 1985 precedent that had blocked property rights cases from federal courts.
This overturning of an older decision sparked a vigorous public debate. Two Supreme Court justices staked out opposing positions: Elena Kagan warned against a rush to overturn precedents, while Clarence Thomas suggested older decisions that are in fact wrong should be changed.
We should welcome this debate because it highlights the judiciary’s duty to correct its own mistakes and to ensure that our constitutional rights are properly and fully protected.
Answer: This amendment include rights of the people which have not been mentioned in the previous Constitutional amendments.
Explanation:
The ninth amendment of the united states constitution describes the rights of the people which were not specifically expressed in the Constitution earlier. Certain rights should not be deny or disparage from people. It reveals those rights which protect people from government infringement and some additional fundamental rights were also added to the constitution after this amendment. Thus these rights should be included in the Bill of Rights.
Divorce: the legal dissolution of a marriage by a court or other competent body.
Desertion: the action of deserting a person, cause, or organization.
