That depends on the college she is going, who is giving the scholarship and the reason why she is leaving. Scholarships, have nothing to do with when you use it... usually. For example, if the person/company/association giving the scholarship said they would give her the scholarship for her las year of college they have to give it to her for that last year doesn't matter if it took one more year to get to that last one or if she got promoted one year above the one she was supposed to be they have to give it to her one year earlier, but it has to be the last year.
So no, it doesn't matter if she takes a year off, she still has her scholarship she just needs a document that says she is taking a year off and why and turn it in to whoever is giving the scholarship.
Answer:
director : cast
Explanation:
The most appropriate option which exhibits the same logical relationship as conductor : orchestra is director : cast.
The conductors is a person who takes charge of the performance and display of singers or orchestras as they sing using gestures to give rules and guidelines to follow in terms of notes and tempos to performing artists. Similarly, the relationship is synonymous between directoe and casts, as the director gives guidelines to artists and assign roles during the making of a film.
Though other options shows relationships between one another, however, the relationship between these selected option is based specifically on one party conducting the actions and performance of the other.
ITS 1 BECUSE HE WAS THE CHARGE
The correct answer is D. By describing an example of how money could be stolen and sent abroad
Explanation:
In the excerpt presented, the author explains a hypothetical situation in which a bank is asked through e.mail to transfer the funds of a client to a different bank account, about this, the author remarks as e-mails do not have a handwritten signature it would not be possible for the bank to know whether the e-mail is written by the owner of the account or a criminal and then ends the text with the main claim or idea that is "it is essential that there is some form of reliable digital signature", this means the information presented before the claim support this by providing a hypothetical situation or an example of the consequences of not having a reliable digital signature and the way money could be stolen as a consequence. Therefore, the author supports the claim by describing an example of how money could be stolen and sent abroad.
