1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nlexa [21]
3 years ago
12

A suspected terrorist is arrested in connection with an imminent terror threat.  A bomb has been discovered at a local shopping

center.The timer shows that the bomb will detonate in 2 hours.  The man in custody is believed to be the bomb maker and the only person who knows how to disable the bomb.  You and your partner are brought in to interrogate the suspect.  An hour passes, and you haven’t made any progress.  Your partner unplugs all of the recording equipment and asks you to leave the room.  Twenty minutes later the officer exits the room with the code to deactivate the bomb.  You look inside the room to find the suspect unconscious and his face covered in blood.  Your partner asks you to back up his story that the suspect became aggressive during the interrogation and that he was simply defending himself.  There is no tape to challenge your version of the events.  It would be the terrorist’s word against yours.
Would you follow your partner’s instructions?  Why or why not?  Be sure to include in your answer the ethical and legal consequences of your decision.
Law
2 answers:
harina [27]3 years ago
7 0
I would not follow my partners instructions, there are many laws in place that are put against this, it would be police brutality, and despite there being a bomb it is still wrong.
Kipish [7]3 years ago
6 0
I would not follow my partners instructions. When you are in law you have to always tell the truth even if that means you are hurting someone who you are close to because of their wrongdoing. If you go along with the lying that makes you almost as bad as the suspect. Plus you are most likely to be caught which can cause serious consequences such a jail time.
You might be interested in
1.) Should officers with body-worn cameras be required to announce they are wearing the devices?
tekilochka [14]

Explanation:

1. No they don't have to announce it if it's obvious to the people or no an officer don't need to announce it

And

2. The body-worn camera should be worn when there's an important issue going on to preserve an evidence and a clue of what really happened and for more reality and caution ⚠

5 0
3 years ago
which article of the U.S. Constitution deals with relations between states and the federal government
victus00 [196]

Answer:

article 4

Explanation:

AKA: article IV

7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP IM STRUGGLING AND I NEED TO KNOW SOMEONE PLEASE!!! THE STATEMENT: In Cantwell Connecticut Newton to Cantwell and his
Sophie [7]

Answer:

HURRY THE FIRST HIS MUM DO BAD

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
A person who believes an agency has violated his or her userra rights may file a complaint with the veterans employment and trai
Pie

A person who believes an agency has violated his or her userra rights may file a complaint with the veterans employment and training service in the department of the Secretary of Labor.

<h3>What is the secretary of labor department?</h3>

In the United States of America, the secretary of labor is the office that is responsible for the overseeing and the management of all functions that pertains to labor in the country.

This person is one that is also in charge of the laws that are made with respect to labor in the nation.

He has to work closely with unions and other labor parastatals to take care of the issues that have to do with workers and their employees and the relationships in the workplace.

Read more on labor here :

brainly.com/question/881501

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
How does the legislative process ensure the validity of laws?
Pavel [41]

Answer:

Answer: Most bills will have an effective date noted in the text of the bill. If an effective date is not noted, however, and if the bill passed by a two-thirds majority, then the bill takes effect immediately. If the bill does not pass by a two-thirds majority, then the bill becomes effective 90 days after adjournment.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can pavement markings indicate that you are driving in the right<br> direction?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the central issue in the Case of Marbury v. Madison?
    6·1 answer
  • How can you prevent carbon monoxide poisoning?<br><br> FL driver ed
    10·1 answer
  • Which one of the following is TRUE?
    8·1 answer
  • Why should drivers who text and drive should be punished the same as those who drink and drive.
    15·1 answer
  • Should i ude the P90 on modern warfare?
    6·1 answer
  • Con rrspecto a la diversidad , ¿Que propuestas tendrias para cambiar y mejorar la situacion de tu país?
    7·1 answer
  • 4. How is criminal law and civil law codified in Arizona?
    5·2 answers
  • Trace the history of public law enforcement in the United States across any century.
    8·1 answer
  • Approaches of democracy
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!