Answer: Yes, and no it is not too much power, because it is a long process and the president isn’t the only one involved in the decision.
Explanation: According to the U.S constitution, article 1, section 7, clause 2. “Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States: If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law.” So as you can see it is a long process and the present her/himself is not alone in the decision.
The president should be able to do that because if he didn't our world today would be so messed up. We wouldn't have any laws. Also that is not too much power.
There is little publicity compared with Acts of Parliament which may mean people are unaware a ruling exists. Control by Parliament isn't always effective. Few affirmative resolutions exist and MP's are too busy to look over them, and controls are often not used anyway. There is a lack of scrutiny.
