The Arab Spring was a loosely related group of protests that ultimately resulted in regime changes in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. Not all of the movements, however, could be deemed successful—at least if the end goal was increased democracy and cultural freedom. In fact, for many countries enveloped by the revolts of the Arab Spring, the period since has been hallmarked by increased instability and oppression. Given the significant impact of the Arab Spring throughout northern Africa and the Middle East, it’s easy to forget the series of large-scale political and social movements arguably began with a single act of defiance.
The Arab Spring began in December 2010 when Tunisian street vendor Mohammed Bouazizi set himself on fire to protest the arbitrary seizing of his vegetable stand by police over failure to obtain a permit. Bouazizi’s sacrificial act served as a catalyst for the so-called Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia. The street protests that ensued in Tunis, the country’s capital, eventually prompted authoritarian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to abdicate his position and flee to Saudi Arabia. He had ruled the country with an iron fist for more than 20 years.
They hurt the social philosophy
Answer:
B. We must be allowed to live independently of the white man's society.
Explanation:
Chief Joseph did not support federal assimilation efforts and believed that this was a strong disrespect for the native community as well as a clear attempt to suppress them and remove them from the land that was rightfully theirs. He claimed that the natives just wanted to maintain their survival, regardless of what the white man thought, they did not want to stop white men, but white men, tried at all costs to exterminate them.
Because of this, we can say that option B is the one that best represents Chief Joseph's argument.
It’s a revolt against military so if they’re being mistreated then yes..
