That could definitely be argued! The WWI was fought in Europe, so many European countries were left in pieces at its end. So they were definitely in need of outside support. One may also look at it from another point of view. The US refused to join the League of Nations, which shows that the country was not necessarily as involved in world affairs as it could have been.
<span>There is a plenty of definitions for globalization, but we can use a generic one to understand this phenomenon: the globalization is the modern state of the world, when people, culture, information, technology, products and many other things can be, easily trade between all nations (almost all) of all continents. This state has its origins in the early 15th/16th centuries, with the maritime expansion.</span>
Answer:
There would be a heavy Nationalistic point inside the foreign policy, in which treaties & alliances would only forged when it benefits the Nationalistic country, & that war would be declared, or that they would only join a war if there would be a huge benefit that can be reaped from the war. Nationalistic views can also lead to a country taking over another one and turning them into a colony to further the resources available or making the nationalistic country more strong.
~
Answer:
it took place while peace talks were still going on
Answer:
Franklin was the greatest political thinker that the British colonies produced.
Explanation:
(im almost positive it this one)
