1. That statement is true.
This type of belief is very common to be held by European Monarchs until the 19th Century.
They view nobles as the holder of 'divine right' and granted by the God to act as a representative that guide humanity on earth. This enables them to impose absolute power in their government.
2. This statement is true.
But the negative impact that the kingdom felt is not experienced by the nobles, eventhough they're the one that cause it.
Their solution to face the financial crisis was to increase the taxes that imposed by common people, making a lot of them to died in Hunger.
3. That statement is True.
The tale of American Revolution who managed to overrule the power of British Empire (which considered as one of the strongest empire in Europe) became the inspiration of many people to rise up against the Monarchs system in europe.
4. That statement is False.
Louise XVI ordered several reforms that aimed to fix the people's perception towards the nobles, but these reforms did not gained support from other nobles who got used to their current of way of living. He also initiate the killing of several people who he regarded as an important influencer for the revolution.
5. I believe that statement is False.
The France indeed involved in war with other European Kingdom during the revolution, but it happened because they wanted to take advantage of the situation and conquered Frace.
The kingdom who wanted to prevent the Revolution actually sent a military support for King Louise XVI
Answer:
Explanation:
A sedentary society is one that doesn't move around and is permanently settled in one place. When early humans began farming, they were able to produce enough food that they no longer had to migrate to their food source.
Answer: Yes the US should have gone to war. There are two sides to the topic, Yes and No. Yes because if we did not go to war with mexico we would not own all the present 50 states. No because war is expensive.
Explanation:
So for Yes you could write. The United States should have gone to war with mexico because, if they didn't then the United states would not be what it is today. A second reason is we needed the resources they had on there territory.
For no you could write. The United States should not have gone to war with mexico because, war is expensive for ammo and troops, a second reason is it was expensive for allies and reinforcements, and shipment.
I found Beirut and Sidon I'm not sure how accurate it is though
Based on research studies, it has been observed that while recent protests and revolutions, such as the Arab spring and Ukrainian revolutions, were fueled by grievances that ignited traditional social movements, these modern movements were facilitated by "<u>the rise of the Internet and popular use of various social media websites."</u>
<h3>What is Protest?</h3>
<u>Protest</u> is a term that describes an objection to what someone or a group of people has said or done.
Sociological analysis showed that in traditional social movements were stimulated by "the rise of the Internet and popular use of various social media websites."
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the internet and social media can increase the potency of protest.
Learn more about Social media influence here: brainly.com/question/10446253
