1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimulka [17.4K]
3 years ago
5

What was a major difference between social reformers and socialists in the

History
1 answer:
RoseWind [281]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The history of socialism has its origins in the 1789 French Revolution and the changes which it brought, although it has precedents in earlier movements and ideas. The Communist Manifesto was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848 just before the Revolutions of 1848 swept Europe, expressing what they termed scientific socialism. In the last third of the 19th century, social democratic parties arose in Europe, drawing mainly from Marxism. The Australian Labor Party was the world's first elected socialist party when it formed government in the Colony of Queensland for a week in 1899.[1]

In the first half of the 20th century, the Soviet Union and the communist parties of the Third International around the world mainly came to represent socialism in terms of the Soviet model of economic development and the creation of centrally planned economies directed by a state that owns all the means of production, although other trends condemned what they saw as the lack of democracy. In the United Kingdom, Herbert Morrison said that "socialism is what the Labour government does" whereas Aneurin Bevan argued that socialism requires that the "main streams of economic activity are brought under public direction", with an economic plan and workers' democracy.[2] Some argued that capitalism had been abolished.[3] Socialist governments established the mixed economy with partial nationalisations and social welfare.

By 1968, the prolonged Vietnam War (1959–1975) gave rise to the New Left, socialists who tended to be critical of the Soviet Union and social democracy. Anarcho-syndicalists and some elements of the New Left and others favoured decentralised collective ownership in the form of cooperatives or workers' councils. Socialists have also adopted the causes of other social movements such as environmentalism, feminism and progressivism.[4] At the turn of the 21st century in Latin America, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez championed what he termed socialism of the 21st century, which included a policy of nationalisation of national assets such as oil, anti-imperialism and termed himself a Trotskyist supporting permanent revolution.[5]

You might be interested in
The (blank) will rise and take the power from the bourgeoisie according to the
charle [14.2K]

Answer:ll kaiser faire

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The _____ fought bravely for the colonists, who doubted their abilities.
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

Rhode Island Regiment

5 0
2 years ago
How did the people react to the healing of the man with the withered hand?
otez555 [7]
This answer to your question is letter A. were angry
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who wrote the Harlem renaissance
irina [24]
Zora Neale Hurtson, Langston Hughes, and Wallace Thurman wrote the Harlem Renaissance.
4 0
3 years ago
What are 10 good and bad adjectives to describe Napoleon?
vivado [14]
Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother.  He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic  talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How much does a stonehenge weigh
    11·1 answer
  • Which leader most helped the patriot cause
    7·1 answer
  • Texas faces all of the following environmental challenges in the 21st century EXCEPT:
    13·2 answers
  • Constructed Response Question
    15·2 answers
  • Why was Hitler’s Mein Kampf such an influential book?
    11·1 answer
  • Which Native American culture, found in the present-day Midwestern, Eastern, and Southeastern US, developed trade and levels of
    14·2 answers
  • What is the function of the crop in birds?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the goals and intentions of President Wilson differ from what happened at Versailles?
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone please help
    7·1 answer
  • 2: Where and when did the Aztecs live and what was significant about their<br> capital?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!