I would say D because I think that best represents a foreign policy.
Make do with what you have. The Mesopotamians gave us a very valuable building material the brick. Having no locally available stone they used the plentiful supplies of mud and clay found on the banks of the Euphrates to make bricks.
There is also trade, exchange what you have for what you lack. In their case it was agricultural produce. This is how Babylon became a thriving and powerful city.
Finally when you finally become more powerful take the resources from your neighbours by force.
Answer: Tax is one of the major source of income for any government. If the government decides to reduce the rate of tax on marginal income, it will increase the wages of workers and reduce the income of the government, therefore motivating workers to work more and increase production. It will also increase consumption, because increase in wages tends to increase ones consumption, which will help to grow the economy or lead to inflation.
Tax cut will increase the population of people who will want to work, because of the increase in wages, thereby causing many others to be unemployed, because the government will not have enough income to great more Employment for it's citizens.
In summary, if tax rate is reduced people will not want to leave their jobs, because of an increase in wages, therefore vacancy for Employment will be difficult in firms, which will reduce the Employment rate, and increase the unemployment rate. Government will not have enough money to creat more jobs for people.
A ________ is a statement that is usually true
Answer:
THEOREM
The option that is an example of spillover costs is A. a manufacturer continues to pollute a river because it does not pay the costs for cleaning it.
<u>'Spillover costs' refers to a consequence that affects a third party that has not taken part in a decision</u>. In other words, 'spillover costs' makes reference to the damage provoked by another person to a third party. This idea is often used to talk about pollution, as it happens in option A). In this case,<u> the consequences of pollution experienced by the third party, who must pay the costs for cleaning pollution, are the spillover costs</u>.