Persia had a huge empire and had every intention of adding Greece to it. The Persian king Darius first attacked Greece in 490 BC, but was defeated at the Battle of Marathon by a mainly Athenian force. The wars with the Persians had a great effect on ancient Greeks.
(so everybody just hated each other )
There are a couple of differences:
1) The Americas (especially Latin America), will not have Roman Catholic influences in the area, and will not have it as their state religion.
2) The land will keep most of it's natural wealth, though it may not be used in great quantities as before.
3) Population will not take a hit, and will continue to grow, as European diseases are not spread to them. However, if trading occurs between the north-eastern tribes all the way down to Central America, they will still be exposed to diseases carried by the French and British.
4) They may not be exposed to the usage of firearms as quickly, which may lead to their demise to their native enemies. Firearms, while they took very long to reload back then, was a symbol of power and was used more as a shock then as a weapon (until the mini-ball, repeater, and other upgrades to the rifle came).
5) The other way to look at it is that another European Power may take over those lands. The first of which is Portugal, whose lands were very near the Spanish territory. The next in line would be France, which borders the Spanish territories, and than Britain.
~
They all killed millions of people
King usually followed Mahatma Gandhi's nonviolent resistance technique.
Hope this helps~
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes because the King agreed to meet with some of the women and promised to distribute all the bread in Versailles to the crowd.
They were demanding bread for their families, after the march the king agreed to distribute bread to the crowd.
