1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
padilas [110]
3 years ago
8

By what processes did state power shift in various parts of the world between 1750 and 1900

History
1 answer:
scoray [572]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Non-state to state colonial control

Explanation:

The processes in which state power shift in various parts of the world between 1750 and 1900 is referred to as "non-state to state colonial control"

This can be seen in the likes of a shift of power from the Dutch East India Company to Dutch government control in Indonesia and Southeast Asia.

Similarly, the shift of power from British East India Company to British government control in places like Hong Kong

You might be interested in
The "shots heard around the world" were fired at
Slav-nsk [51]

Answer:

I believe its B (Lexington)

Explanation:

They were fired by a unknown force.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the first astronauts to land on the moon.
8090 [49]
Hello, there!

The answers are Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong.

They both flew to the moon in the Apollo 11.

Neil was the first man on the moon and Buzz was the second


I hope I helped!

Let me know if you need anything else!

~ Zoe

8 0
3 years ago
Incapacitation relies on future considerations-criminals are punished because of what they may do in the future based on what th
Juliette [100K]
It seems that you have missed the necessary options to answer this question, but anyway, this statement is considered FALSE. It is not true that incapacitation <span>relies on future considerations-criminals are punished because of what they may do in the future based on what they did in the past. Hope this answer helps.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
1. How do I know which is fed and antifed in Bill of Rights
JulijaS [17]

Answer: Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights was necessary because, the supremacy clause in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses would allow implied powers that could endanger rights. Federalists rejected the proposition that a bill of rights was needed.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Twenty-three tribes in Washington operated gaming facilities in 2013, showing that American Indians
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

A tribal gaming site in Washington state. There are over 400 Indian gaming establishments operating in the U.S. in 2015, ... legitimacy of casinos and bingo halls on American Indian reservations. ... 50% in the twenty years from 1990 to 2010, far outpacing growth for Americans generally during this period.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How many miles did hannibal travel to get from spain to rome?
    6·1 answer
  • Is there definite and concrete-evidence that God exists?
    11·2 answers
  • Seven southern slave states had seceded by the time lincoln was sworn in as president in 1861.
    8·2 answers
  • a)Identify, based on your reading, ONE specific example about the relationship between government and public works during the 13
    6·1 answer
  • What is the capital city of South Korea
    10·1 answer
  • What code of behavior developed in the Middle Ages to guide the actions of knights?
    7·1 answer
  • How did John C Marshall influence the role of the Supreme Court? A) During marshals tenure as a chief justice, the corking to th
    12·1 answer
  • What British company originally established control of India?
    7·1 answer
  • Emperor Guangxu instituted sweeping reforms to modernize the government and the economy, and as a result.
    10·2 answers
  • What is the main concern in History???<br><br> Please Help Thank You
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!