Answer:
m=243/4 when v=9.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that when y varies directly with x², the formula of direct proportion is
where 'k' is the constant of variation.
so
As m varies directly with v², and m=3 when v=2
m=kv²
k=m/v²
= 3/(2)²
=3/4
Hence, k=3/4
so when v=9 then the expression becomes
m=kv²
substituting v=9 and k=3/4
m= 3/4(9)²
=3/4 × 81
=243/4
Therefore, m=243/4 when v=9.
2.5d+5=65
minus both sides by 5 to cancel out the 5
2.5d=60
divide both sides by 2.5 to get d by itself
d=24
the number of days margo owned the plant is 24
Hope Your Thanksgiving Went Well, Here's Some Help Cleaning Up
-TheKoolKid1O1
Answer:
The reason why points and lines my be co-planer even when the plane containing them is not drawn is because the by their definition two lines or a line and a point or three points which are fixed in space always have have a direction of view from which they appear as a single line, or for the three points, appear to be on a single line.
This can be demonstrated by the shape of a cross which is always planner
Examples include
1) Straight lines drawn across both side of the pages of an open book to meet at the center pf the book can always be made planner by the orientation#
2) This can be also demonstrated by the plane of the two lines in the shape of a cross which is always planner regardless of the orientation of the cross
3) The dimension that can be defined by three points alone is that of a planner (2-dimensional) triangle shape
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
5/6*4/5=20/30
20/30 divided by ten equals 2/3
the answer is 2/3
Answer:
No.
There's no congruence theorem or statement that proves that 2 triangles with 2 sides and a non-included angle are congruent to each other.
Step-by-step explanation:
The triangles given, ∆ABC and ∆CYZ both have a non-included angle and two sides given that are congruent to each other.
However, this alone is not enough to prove that both ∆s are congruent to each other because there is also possiblity of another ∆ that will have the same two equal sides and a non-included angle as any of the 2, and can thereby have different shape and size.
There's also no congruency statement that proves that two triangles with congruent two sides and a non-included angle are congruent to each other.
Therefore, the information to us is not enough.
