Answer:
The Ark of the Covenant had the stone tablets with the commandments in it, It was used to communicate with God and it is said that he would appear over it when priests came to it. It is hard to say what happened to it since there is not much evidence to say it ever existed. Even if it did exists it most likely had no magical powers
The whites gained the control of Chutepalu when they invited the chiefs that the tribe had to a meeting with the council and then they promised them that they would have their own country if only they signed a treaty that would have them to give up their lands.
<h3>How the Chute-Pa-lu lost their lands</h3>
In the year 1877, one of the chiefs had refused that they would relinquish their lands to the white people in the area. This was met by a fight were he was defeated by the white people. He and his people were then moved to Fort Leavenworth from there to Baxter Springs, Kansas, and finally to Indian Territory
Hence we can say that The whites gained the control of Chute-pa-lu when they invited the chiefs that the tribe had to a meeting with the council and then they promised them that they would have their own country if only they signed a treaty that would have them to give up their lands.
Read more on the Chute-Pa-lu here: brainly.com/question/17373599
#SPJ1
I beleive it began in Oklahoma. Hope this helps!
Do you know the context?
I suppose the quotation is stressing that the writer has put a lot of effort into getting their argument/grievances heard by the parliament, and that said parliament is 'tyrannical', implying that it rules without concern for the people or accountability to them. It seems that the quote may be a way of justifying some later action, essentially saying; 'we've tried and failed to do this in the proper way, so now we must be more forceful'.
B and c because usually those assassinations were broadcasted to the audiences
