Answer:
A king would need supporters (soilders) first, because if no one approved of his ruling style or policies not many would want to fight for him, unless he requires a mandatory "draft like" situation to get more soilders. Also, he would need money to buy resources. Some resources he may need to enlarge his army would be suffiecent weapons, protective armor, and the latest war techiqnology of the time.
Explanation:
Well japan was never in world war WW1 but for Germany they again lost land creating a couple countries new countries but the difference for ww2 was it ended up being divided completely
answer: they formed monasteries run by monks and nuns
explanation:
- Brahmansim is a separate sacrificial religion that emerged in post-Vedic India under the power of the brahmans and is considered to be an early development of Hinduism.
- The Buddhist did not spread Hinduism throughout India because it was spread by followers of Hinduism. Hinduism mostly spread throughout India by Hindu merchants/ traders and through contagious diffusion.
- Buddhism does not outlaw all other religions. Buddhism actually allows its followers to follow multiple religions, it is not uncommon for Buddhists to also follow religions such as Islam.
- Buddhists DID form monasteries run by monks and nuns as early as the first century and they continued to form in areas associated with Buddhism. Buddhists created monasteries as a way to value, continue his teachings, follow, and honor the Buddha after his earlier death (his date/year of death is debated).
hope this helps :)
Hi there, there were in total three motivations for European colonization which were God, glory, and gold.
Europeans had just recently arrived in Europe. Financially, culturally, scientifically, they had advanced... Basically, battles had ended due to newfound prosperity (Spain was financially more stable and with craving for power). Additionally, they had certain ideas about geography that led them to believe that there were unexplored regions of the planet. It's important to note that Christophe Colomb (let's call him Colomb) wasn't the smartest or most knowledgeable person in the room. He did really believe he was pursuing the "Indians," therefore it just so happens that he ended himself in America. His journal effectively captures the period's Europeans' avarice, sense of entitlement, and desire to "possess" the entire planet. Today, if we learned of a new location on Earth that hasn't yet been explored, we would act similarly and go exploring. Who could accomplish it? those with the most income, technology, and resources. Because it was the only region in the globe having those resources, Europe was the one investigating in the fifteenth century. It was unaware of the importance of every human existence (I'm generalizing here; not all people were thus illiterate), of distinctions, or of alternative points of view (religion, beliefs). Even though many people lost their lives on these earlier journeys, which weren't necessarily undertaken for the best reasons, they did help shape how Europe is now. Although there was existing diversity, respect, new ideals, and cultural interests somehow emerged. The world is what it is now because of history. Who can say what America would look like now if these discoveries hadn't taken place? This is a question for another time.
Thank you,
Eddie
<span> truth, trust, tradition",
since this confederacy (also known as the Five Nations) was made in
order to facilitate trade and peace between the tribes.
</span>
