British captures, foreign countries (mainly France), and colonial ironworks. Initially, Washington's fledgling force relied largely on what it could wrest from the British.
Do you have any options for this? :)
The British army depended on their navy a great deal, while the Americans did not need a navy to win the war.
The British army controlled their troops in the hope of winning colonists to their side, while the Americans failed to establish any kind of control over their army.
Answer: Option C & D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The British navy was the largest navy in the whole world. The name of he British navy was the royal navy. Since it was the largest navy in the world, it was the most powerful navy and therefore the British people were dependent on the navy at a great deal for fighting against their enemies. On the other hand, the american army did not depend that much on the navy and their navy was not that powerful also.
C because it from someone who lived during said time
<span>The idea of the invisible hand is the basic idea of laissez faire capitalism. According to this idea, a capitalist society functions without anyone in control of it. There is no "visible hand" telling companies what to make as there is in a more command-style...and more.
well if this helped would you please click thanks and you wellcome.
</span>