Some (not all) men are against shifting gender roles because, historically and presently the nature of gender roles typically put males at a societal advantage. So the concept of having shifts in these gender roles, means that many males are often nervous that they will lose the stability in the systematic designation of societal standing due to gender, that was always designed to favour them. Although these fears are irrational, as most of the modern movements in relation to gender roles are in favour of freedom of the individual, and not intended to put any group or person at a disadvantage.
Televisión internet film i
Answer: The conflict that sets this story in motion and makes it complicated is the fact that the young children on the train are bored and desire to hear an entertaining story while traveling.
Explanation:
The conflict that sets this story in motion and makes it complicated is the fact that the young children on the train are bored and desire to hear an entertaining story while traveling.
Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.
Answer:
1 and 3. I just answered the question, it could of been all of the above also, it didn't say, but either way they are right
Explanation:
