III. hasty generalization
A syllogistic fallacy is more of a generalization than it is a sequence or analogy. This error of reasoning occurs by first mentioning something broad/general then proceeds to make a conclusion about something that is very specific by means of generalizing. For example, this would be considered fallacy of syllogism:
All jets are air crafts. All propeller airplanes are air crafts. Therefore, propeller airplanes are jets.
Thus, you can see how a generalization is made about propeller airplanes being jets because they are both air crafts.
Well, you're going to talk about the conflicts in The Lottery and The Lady or the Tiger... So... in The Lottery, the main conflict was that the lady (whatever her name was) was chosen to be stoned in the lottery. It wasn't really resolved in anyway, except that she got.. stoned. I haven't read The Lady or the Tiger, but you would do the same thing for that. Then you would state the theme, or moral, or main point, of each story. And then you would compare how the resolutions for both conflicts demonstrate the stories' themes.. Does it make a bit more sense?
Not following the law; Disobeying the law
The first line of the poem 'To the doctor who treated the
raped baby and felt such despair' by Finuala Dowling is “<span>I just wanted to say on behalf of us all. The plural
pronoun used is ‘us’ which represents a lot of them wanted to say something to
the doctor but instead only a single person spoke.</span>