1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semmy [17]
3 years ago
13

Read the excerpt from Henry David Thoreau's "Resistance to Civil

English
1 answer:
8090 [49]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B. He uses rhetorical questions to evoke the readers response

You might be interested in
Writing practice
Crazy boy [7]

Which of these three do you think was a neighbour to the man who fell into the hand of robbers? Isn't he the one who had mercy on him?

The Samaritan was the one who helped the man. The Samaritan, yes he had mercy on the poor man even though they were perhaps from distinct regions and religions. If the man was from Jerusalem he was perhaps an Israelite an Israelites despised Samaritans due to their worship of many Gods. So, that the Samaritan took pity on this man was a leap of faith. After the man recovered he could have pretended that the Samaritan man never took care of him or that he never knew him in the first place.

1. What happened to the traveller when he was on his way to Jericho?

He got robbed, he fell into the hands of multiple robbers as the passage says “robbers” in plural. Then, “They stripped him of his clothes, beat him, and went away leaving him half-dead.”

2.What did the priest and the rich man do when they saw the half-dead traveller lying on the road?

Both went and walked the other side, they didn‘t help the poor man who was almost half-dead. The priest had a duty or obligation to the man because he was a priest. Supposedly he was to set an example for the community and those around him. He was to obey Gods laws to “help thou neighbor”. And, the rich man had the economic disposition to actually help the man, he just didn’t want to.

3.How did the Samaritan react when he saw the badly injured traveller?

He took pity on the man.

4. a. Why did the Samaritan give some money to the innkeeper?

So the innkeeper could take care of the man.

b. This shows he was kind, caring and generous. True or False? True

5.According to this story, can strangers be our neighbours?. Explain.

Yes, strangers can be our neighbors. The reason I state this is because strangers can help us in our time of need. Of course, strangers won’t help us move our couch to our new home. But, if we are being kidnapped and we scream for help and run, someone, a stranger can help us in our time of need. Also, strangers can help us with small tasks such as bringing our grocery to the car, etc.

8 0
3 years ago
Use the following definitions to answer the question. evade: 1. (verb) to cleverly escape somebody or something, to avoid invade
irina1246 [14]

The sentence that contains the correct word usage of evade versus invade is "Corn leaf aphids invaded the crop and caused damage to the plants." If we replace the word invaded with its definition we can see why. The sentence would read, "Corn leaf aphids entered the crop and caused damage to the plant. This makes sense. A corn leaf aphid is a pest, so it would not make sense if they evaded or left the plant and caused damage. That would be a good thing.

You can use the same technique to see why the other three sentences use the incorrect word.

<u>The thieves were able to invade being arrested by the police. </u>

This would read, "The thieves were able to enter being arrested by the police. This does not make sense. Rather, it should read, "The thieves were able to evade being arrested by the police." Thus, meaning they were able to cleverly escape being arrested.

<u>Guerrilla forces evaded the capital city and announced their power.</u>

This would read, "Guerrilla forces cleverly escaped the capital city and announced their power." While this sentence could make sense in the right context, it is more likely that they forcefully entered the capital city, or invaded it, in order to announce their power.

<u>Sheila tried to evade the private party by bribing the security guard.</u>

This would read, "Sheila tried to cleverly escape the private party by bribing the security guard." Again, this could make sense in the right context, but it is most likely that she bribed the security guard in order to enter a party that she wanted to intend. Therefore, the use of "invade" makes more sense.


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Turn the following ten words, which are in italics in the passage,
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

prevalence → verb → to prevail

potentially → noun → potential

vulnerable → noun → vulnerability

accessible → verb → to access

censorship → adverb → censorious

volunteer → adjective → voluntary

dubious → noun → dubiousness

system → adjective → systematic

regular → verb → to regulate

suitability → verb​ → to suit

Explanation:

In the English language, especially when it comes to words originated from Latin, it is common to change words with the addition or removal of certain parts -- the affixes. Notice, for example, that to transform "vulnerable" into a noun, we added a suffix (an ending): "vulnerability". On the other hand, to transform "censorship" into an adverb, we changed suffixes: "censorious". It is important to know and understand the use of affixes. They are a helpful means to figure out the meanings of new words.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the wild eose bush a symbol of?
adell [148]

Answer:

The rose bush symbolizes nature in its potency, solace, and freedom so  in other words it's A

Explanation:

I got it from my quiz study guide sheet.

6 0
3 years ago
For your history project, you need to write a magazine article about the
Mnenie [13.5K]

The correct answer is A. Your teacher wants you to examine how point of view influences hero selection

Explanation

Newspaper articles are primary sources of information because these documents report important events in an objective way for the knowledge of the general public. In addition, they serve to know first-hand events of the past. In this case, the teacher gives his students articles from Japanese and American newspapers to write an article on the attack on Pearl Harbor.

An interesting aspect of this activity is that the vision of both articles is different because each author has a different point of view about the event of Pearl Harbor. In this case, each one points out the soldiers or military personnel of their country as heroes because they share its ideals of struggle.

This activity is quite important to investigate because it allows students to know about an event through different points of view, and also learn more about it and have a broader vision of what happened.

So, the correct answer is A. Your teacher wants you to examine how point of view influences hero selection

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement is a summary of part of the plot of the book being reviewed?
    8·2 answers
  • What do we finally find out about where holden is while he is telling the story?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the point of the view of the poem "Ozymandias" and what effect does it have on who the reader hears
    14·2 answers
  • * Make sentences of the following phrases: - nothing but - accompanied by - belongs to - listen to
    5·2 answers
  • Please help me with this
    15·1 answer
  • How do u spell homograph?
    6·2 answers
  • Why doesn't Nick judge Gatsby harshly? Please describe Nick's personality
    15·1 answer
  • Which event in the rising action add tension to the major conflict
    15·1 answer
  • HELP QUICKLY!!!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • 14. <br> What is the last sentence in every paragraph<br> (except the conclusion) of an essay?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!