1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
spin [16.1K]
3 years ago
7

The Supreme Court interpreted the Fifth Amendment in Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informe

d of their rights Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights
History
2 answers:
kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago
6 0
The Supreme Court interpreted the fourteenth amendment to mean that states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it. In Miranda v. Arizona the Supreme Court ruled that accused individuals have a right to be informed of their rights. 
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
6 0

I believe the answer is: Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

The ruling became a landmark decision which required the police to tell the detainees about their 'miranda rights' when they are being arrested. The right include the right to remain silent and wait for lawyers because everything they say can be used against them on the court,

You might be interested in
Evaluate the most significant political effect of the wars of religion in Europe in the period 1517 to 1648.
Molodets [167]

The aftermath of these tumultuous events is that after the religious wars, the Catholic Church split into the Catholic and a number of Protestant churches. Religious peace was established.

Creation of some new independent countries on the soil of Europe, such as Netherlands and Swiss Confederation.

Politically, the dominance of  Habsburgs has been greatly weakened. The emperor lost certain powers by agreement - he no longer had the right to decide on war and peace and collect taxes independently.

Explanation:

  • The war had disastrous consequences for the Empire. As a victim of war or various epidemics, about 5 millions died in the Empire  or 20% of the total population, making it the most devastating in European history until the great wars of the 20th century.
  • With the demographic decline, great damage was done to the economy.
  • By the end of the war, agriculture was largely destroyed, and by 1648 a third of the cultivated land was abandoned throughout the Empire. The largest drop was suffered by trade, which was kept to a minimum by the end of the war.
  • As a political consequence of the war, a lasting religious peace emerges and religion ceases to be the cause of European conflicts, and the horrors of war greatly contribute to a general sense of insecurity, which results in the strengthening of the role of rulers and leads to the development of absolutism.

Learn more on Religious wars on

brainly.com/question/260571

brainly.com/question/6355896

brainly.com/question/515617

brainly.com/question/8040976

#learnwithBrainly

4 0
4 years ago
Iraqi leader, ______ , instigated the beginning of the Iran-Iraq War.
Eddi Din [679]
B. Saddam Hussein. hope I helped
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how did the newly formed united states of america pay off the debts incurred during the revolutionary war
Maru [420]
We worked harder and we helped each other out and we all came together as one
7 0
3 years ago
With the capture of _____, all confederate supplies from and communication with the west were cut off. vicksburg chattanooga chi
denis23 [38]
<span>This would be the capture of Vicksburg. From the spring of 1862 through the summer of 1863, Union solders attempted to take control of the Confederates stronghold of Vicksburg, Mississippi. The city was important because it sat on the bank of the Mississippi River.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
During the debate over the Constitution, which party argued for strong, independent states?
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

The answer is D. the Anti-Federalist Party

Explanation:

They feared the authority of a single national government, upper-class dominance, inadequate separation of powers, and loss of immediate control over local affairs. Also, they opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. But, even though the Constitution was passed Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the significance of the battle at fort necessity
    8·1 answer
  • What did the leader of the Xia dynasty do? A. Eliminated the Shang emperor B. Created Daoism C. Established the Mandate of Heave
    11·2 answers
  • In which phrases from “The Bells” does Poe use onomatopoeia? Check all that apply. “From the bells, bells, bells, bells” “Yet th
    8·2 answers
  • How does Article I of the U.S. Constitution embody the principle of republicanism?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement accurately describes one of congresss methods of limiting presidential power
    15·2 answers
  • The main function of the executive branch is to.
    5·1 answer
  • Tax bills may be introduced either in the House of
    8·1 answer
  • What was one of Japan's primary goals during World War I?
    14·1 answer
  • How do you think that the Jallianwala Bagh incident was the turning point of the friendly relationship between Indians and the B
    7·1 answer
  • How did 16 December changes reflect the values outlined in the south African constitution<br>​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!