Answer:
Cold as snow is the answer
Answer:
<h3>The contract should be dissolved if any people are being oppressed.</h3>
Explanation:
In the second passage, the author <u>does not make any provisions for oppression or exploitation</u>. The author strongly argues that social contract should be an association of every single individual who would enjoy equal freedom and opportunities as everyone.
The author's view on the dissolution of the social contract best reflects on the statement 'The contract should be dissolved if any people are being oppressed.'
The author says that social contract would be no more a contract if any person is being oppressed or exploited.
The slippery slope fallacy is something that many people fall into while writing something persuasive. This fallacy mostly happens when it is a primarily emotional argument with no factual support. The way it works is you make a claim that isn't entirely true, and then you base the rest of your argument on this point, even more "facts" off of this one slightly true fact you have stated. An example of this would be: "We can't allow people to go treasure hunting. By going treasure hunting people are more likely to trespass on other people's land in order to find treasure. By making trespassing less serious, people will start to loss their sense of other people's privacy. As you can see, if we allow people to pursuer treasure hunting, they will eventually start to break into other people's homes."
<span> A. California has three of the top ten most populated cities in the United States
this contains an adverb clause
so correct option is A
hope it helps</span>
