I assume you're talking about the Revolutionary era. The colonists wanted to go to war for their independence. They didn't have representation in the government, yet they were still taxed.
Humans must have external constraints in order to live together
The immediate cause for World War 1 was the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his pregnant wife Sophie. Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was the nephew of Emperor Franz Josef and heir to the throne of Austria and Hungary.
Answer:
banking practices that put the entire financial system at risk
Explanation:
What caused the crash of the real estate market in 2008 can be traced to "banking practices that put the entire financial system at risk."
This is evident in the fact that many Lenders were observed to be less stringent in their approach in lending credit to borrowers, including those that are not fit to acquire the credits.
This led to increasing housing prices to a degree that many could not really have the money for.
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.
Explanation:
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law
.
Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.
