1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timama [110]
3 years ago
14

What is the significance of extradition between the states? a. shows that the states are selfish and not wanting to work togethe

r to apprehend a fugitive c. shows that states are not willing to work together but if by chance catch a criminal then the state will return the fugitive b. shows that the states are willing to allow another state into their state but unwilling to help apprehend a fugitive d. shows that the states are willing to work together to apprehend fugitives
History
2 answers:
andrezito [222]3 years ago
8 0
Answer is D. Shows that the states are willing to work together

nexus9112 [7]3 years ago
7 0
IT IS D the answer is d 
You might be interested in
Did the Founding Fathers set up a government that was truly representative for all Americans?​
artcher [175]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

George Washington was the first president and I guess they all came from somewhere else then they came to America, and the HAD to create a governmental system because it would be chaos with out one : )

3 0
3 years ago
PLEEEEEEAAAASE HELP
son4ous [18]

Answer:

I believe its Texas

Explanation:

HOPE IT HELPS YOU!!!! BE SAFE!!! :D

8 0
2 years ago
Why did visigoths attack rome
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

The Visigoths sack Rome. At its height the Roman Empire stretched from Britain and the Atlantic to North Africa and Mesopotamia. ... He hoped to draw the Visigoths into an alliance against the eastern Romans, but now hordes of other Germanic warriors invaded the western empire across the Rhine.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The political structure of the Roman Empire included all of the following from the Roman Republic except
Alisiya [41]
Hi lovely,

The answer you're looking for would be B) Checks and Balances.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Contrast the struggles faced by settlers headed west and the American Indian tribes they met. How did the tribes often harm sett
sattari [20]

Answer:  Settlers and tribes both had effects on each other. On many trails headed west, settlers traveled in fear of attack from tribes who would rob or kill members of caravans. Tribes would attack stagecoaches and wagons that traveled across their lands. On the other hand, settlers constantly encroached on tribes’ lands. When settlers drove cattle, built railroads, established trails, and created new settlements, tribes were driven off of their lands. Often, this happened to tribes that had already relocated from other parts of the country to escape settlement. As the two groups fought over land, tribes struggled to get the resources they needed. While both groups profited from each other, both also were harmed by expansion in different ways.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was robespierre guillotined
    8·1 answer
  • In Greek mythology, who was the goddess of wisdom, known as Minerva in Roman mythology?
    14·2 answers
  • According to the American colonists a government is only legitimate if it has
    13·2 answers
  • Why do you think the United States Senators rejected the Treaty of Versailles (the U.S. never did sign that treaty)? In your opi
    6·1 answer
  • Which era spanned from 100,000
    8·2 answers
  • What happened as a result of Columbus‘s coming to the American continents
    8·2 answers
  • Who won the election of 1820
    6·2 answers
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise resolved the issue over whether ​
    10·1 answer
  •  What was the invasion of Iraq about<br>​
    10·2 answers
  • What emboldened the women who worked in the Lowell mills and facilitated their ability to organize the strikes of the 1830s
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!