Answer:
Correct answer is A. Christianity spread within the borders of the Roman Empire.
Explanation:
Only option A is correct as we can see that the areas where the Christianity was spreading were part of the Roman Empire.
B is not correct because it spread outside Italy, in Egypt, Syria, Great Britain...
Option C is not correct as we have no evidence that it spread only around the Atlantic Ocean, but around Mediterranean.
Last option is also not correct as it spread in North Africa, not throughout it.
The correct answer is more prosperous and less democratic
Japanese conquests led to a wave of euphoria and enthusiasm in Japan, which, coupled with extensive indoctrination, developed a strong nationalism that defended imperialist ambitions. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, there was an extreme right-wing authoritarian regime in Japan that fueled nationalist militarism and Japanese imperialism.
This nationalist and imperialist discourse in Japan claimed that the mission in China was unique and exclusively civilizing, but it is known that Japanese interests were motivated by economic issues. During the 1930s, two incidents led to the Japanese invasion of Manchuria (northeastern China) and, finally, the start of the war.
Answer:
In the 7th century, a change occurred in the deserts of Arabia that would end up changing the face of the world. From the deserts of Arabia, the Arabs would emerge and challenge perhaps the two greatest empires of their time. They would defeat these great empires in battle after battle. Nothing would be able to stop them. They would face their enemies outnumbered and outmatched, with a new faith within their hearts, and emerge victorious. From the victories would rise Arab empires that have since been unmatched, the Ummayads and Abbasids.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST PRESSING THE CROWN BUTTON ON MY ANSWER PLS
The best answer in that set would seem to be "compromise." I'm not sure I'd use exactly that term, but it's the best term from the set of answers given. Count Camillo di Cavour was prime minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia, serving under King Victor Emmanuel II. This was a time in history (in the 19th century) when prime ministers were starting to exercise more control of policy than the kings themselves. It was also a time of something that came to be known a "Realpolitik" (a German term), or "realistic politics." So I'd say Cavour was a political realist who chose paths of action that would benefit his overall aims, whether or not they fit some specific ideology or master plan. I suppose "compromise" would be another way of saying that, but I'd prefer to say he practiced political realism.
