Answer:
Palming off requires proof of the likelihood of confusion,hence B is the correct option.
Explanation:
Palming off is misrepresenting someone else's product as one's.This is an offence that one can be sued for in business law.
For such cases to be acceptable to courts of appropriate jurisdiction,the claimant must proof beyond reasonable that, for instance the defendant's product can be mistaken for his.
For example. a milk product branded as Nikki can be mistaken for another known as Nikke.
Answer: Net Pension liability of $29 million
Explanation:
A net pension liability will be reported when the obligations of the employer which is the Projected benefit obligation, exceeds the Plan assets because the company has less resources than required to satisfy its obligations.
A net pension asset will be when the Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) is less than the Plan assets.
In this case, there will be a Net pension liability of;
= PBO - Plan assets
= 75 - 46
= $29 million
Answer:
1)
cost of making (14000*22) = 308000
cost of buying (14000*(18+6)) = 336000
Difference cost = 28000
2)
No, Since, there is not other use of fixed cost, therefore, fixed cost will be a part of cost of buying.
3-a)
cost of making (14000*22) = 308000
cost of buying (14000*18) = 252000
3-b)
Yes, Since, there is other use of fixed cost, therefore, fixed cost will not be a part of cost of buying.
Answer:
The Time Value of Money formula is FV = PV x [ 1 + (i / n) ] (n x t)] where V is the Future value of money, PV is the Present value of money, i is the interest rate, n is the number of impounding periods per year, and t is the number of years.