Beginning with the battle of Orleans, Joan of Arc entered the Burgundian territory disguised as a male. She then met the future King Charles and made a good impression by him. She was said to be the inspiration of a collapsing France, so the court provided her with troops and support. She revived the lost hope of France, winning battles one after another. Joan carried her banner in battle and is said to have never killed anyone. However in the year 1430, she was later captured at Compiegne by Lionel de Wandomme. She was imprisoned at Beaurevoir castle and was later transferred to a keep Rouen. Joan was trialed by pro-Anglo clerics and was declared as heretic and a witch. She was executed by burning in the same year 1430.
Answer:
Internet
Explanation:
When looking up stuff for essays make sure to use your notes and to go on websites that end in .gov, or, org.
DescriptionParticipation in social science refers to different mechanisms for the public to express opinions – and ideally exert influence – regarding political, economic, management or other social decisions.
The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.
It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.
It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.
A microhistorical approach to the Cuban Missile Crisis might study <span>a single day of the crisis that fits into a pattern of bigger problems between the two countries, since micro history by definition usually spans a single, important day at most if dealing with a period of time. </span>
