1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
7

Did the supreme court decisions under john marshall's leadership extend federal power too much? is it appropriate that someone w

ho was not elected should have such tremendous power to shape the government and the law? is it appropriate that a political party's ideology be implemented through the judiciary?
History
1 answer:
mash [69]3 years ago
7 0

The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.

It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.

It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.

You might be interested in
ILL GIVE 25 POINTS PLZ HELP<br> Identify the consequences to leaving women out of history.
son4ous [18]

ERROR                                                  .....................

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did these regulations have little effect on big businesses
mariarad [96]

Answer: you need to be more in depth with ur questions

Explanation:

4 0
1 year ago
Using complete sentences, describe the role of the State Department in handling United States foreign relations.
Roman55 [17]
<span>the United States Department of State, often referred to as the State Department, is the United States federal executive department responsible for international relations of the United States, equivalent to the foreign ministry of other countries. hope this helps</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Democracy will not come .Today,this year nor ever through compromise and fear. what does democracy mean.
anyanavicka [17]
Democracy is the belief that freedom shall be for all, and all people should hold a voice in government. It is a type of government.  
7 0
3 years ago
Why does Hamilton believe that a specific listing of rights “is far less applicable” to the Federal Constitution than to state c
NARA [144]
Alexander Hamilton, Alexander Hamilton
If he got a problem he can Alexander handle it
Lost 150 pounds
Alexander dam he thin

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hahahaahhahahahahahhahaahahahahahahahahaha
    13·2 answers
  • The Babylonians practiced ____<br><br> monotheism,polytheism
    9·2 answers
  • 24
    15·1 answer
  • In which world regions or countries was seven years war fought
    9·2 answers
  • WHAT DOES B man mean
    15·2 answers
  • Write down the names the personalities who were the part of freedom of pakistan​
    8·1 answer
  • How did Hitler break the Treaty of Versailles?
    13·1 answer
  • How did World War II affect civilians?
    12·1 answer
  • Pls answer i will give brainliest
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the civil war happen? What were the aims of the opposing sides?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!