1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
7

Did the supreme court decisions under john marshall's leadership extend federal power too much? is it appropriate that someone w

ho was not elected should have such tremendous power to shape the government and the law? is it appropriate that a political party's ideology be implemented through the judiciary?
History
1 answer:
mash [69]3 years ago
7 0

The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.

It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.

It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.

You might be interested in
Should people have to pay extra on soda and junk food
Sidana [21]
No because tax is stupid
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the third paragraph again. Given what Hammond is saying, what might be a potential problem for the North if the two sides, North
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why did James Oglethorpe wanted the Highland Scots to move to Georgia
klasskru [66]

Because they were skilled And they had the experience soldiers

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Madison believed that the U.S. had to go to war with british for all of the following reasons except
eimsori [14]

Answer:

  • Get the British to revoke their Orders in Council, which placed harsh trade restrictions on the Americans.
  • Get the British to stop the impressment of American sailors into the Royal Navy.
  • Defend Americans' rights to freedom of the seas .

Explanation:

<u>The Impressment of Sailors</u>

Impressment of sailors was the operation of Britain's Royal Navy of sending officers to board American ships, examine its crew, and seize the sailors that were found guilty of being runaways from British ships.  

occurrences of impressment are often recognized as one of the causes of the War of 1812. And while it is true that impressment occurred on a regular basis in the first decade of the 19th century, the exercises was not always seen as a awfully significant problem.

It was widely known that vast numbers of British sailors did abandon from British warships, frequently because of the hard regulations and miserable surroundings endured by seamen in the Royal Navy.  

The impressment of sailors was definitely one of the causes of the War of 1812.

<u>Trade Restrictions of the Americans</u>

With the early Englishmen that settled in Jamestown, Virginia, and Plymouth, Massachusetts, England did little to direct their trade. As the colonies got more prosperous, however, England began to enforce its mercantile ideologies. A string of laws were passed in 1660s known as the Navigation Acts. They were established to make the Americans depend on the manufactured products of England. The colonists, of course, were expected to buy more from England than they sold and pay the gap(difference) in gold and silver. Therefore, England forbade all non-English ships from trading with colonies.

<u>Freedom of the seas</u>

A challenge to the discipline of freedom of the seas arose soon after the conclusion of the revolutionary war. In 1784,  American commercial shipping in the Mediterranean, lacking the shielding of he British navy, came under attack from the North African Kingdoms along what was known as the Barbary Coast.

<u>EXCEPT</u>

<u><em>The federalists opposed the war</em></u>, they viewed the war as way to further the interests of the Republicans. The federalists also feared that the war would through the nation into the arms of the Napoleon.

6 0
3 years ago
Where did secretary of state brian kemp go to high school?
UkoKoshka [18]
University if Georgia
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the four election reforms adopted by the state of Oregon?
    8·1 answer
  • Answer each question with 1-3 complete sentences
    14·2 answers
  • What issue was resolved at the Casablanca Conference?
    6·1 answer
  • Two problems that’s the us had in the war of vietnam
    11·1 answer
  • English colonies were established by joint-stock companies controlled by, monarchs, clergymen, businessmen, or American Indian L
    14·2 answers
  • How did Nationalism start?
    8·2 answers
  • 8. Do you think
    5·1 answer
  • What can someone do in addition to cutting all unnecessary expenses to make sure expenses don't exceed income?
    8·1 answer
  • During wwi, the western front in europe was characterized by:.
    11·1 answer
  • Why do plants and animals adapt to their
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!