1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
7

Did the supreme court decisions under john marshall's leadership extend federal power too much? is it appropriate that someone w

ho was not elected should have such tremendous power to shape the government and the law? is it appropriate that a political party's ideology be implemented through the judiciary?
History
1 answer:
mash [69]3 years ago
7 0

The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.

It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.

It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.

You might be interested in
Who ran for the senate against stephen douglas and had a series of debates about slavery with him
erastovalidia [21]
I believe it was Abraham Lincoln
5 0
3 years ago
The creation of the Constitution did not happen immediately after the American Revolution ended.
Maru [420]

Answer:

B, trust me I had a question similar to this.

Explanation:

hope this helped

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. When a second concussion is received before the signs of the first concussion have been
Goryan [66]
The answer is c .hemorrhage
5 0
3 years ago
______ increased competition for power among European states and led to imperialism.
zhuklara [117]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would be a noneconomic cost of a government's decision to build a
PtichkaEL [24]
The answer is actually d it was desti
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the five broad categories that describe the way in which nominations are made
    11·1 answer
  • How did business and government officials plan to connet new york with the great lake region
    11·1 answer
  • Pregunta 1 de 10
    11·1 answer
  • After farmers in the Fertile Crescent developed techniques to transfer water, people no longer needed to____
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a characteristic of humanism?
    6·2 answers
  • The Constitution was drafted in 1787. Select TWO of the choices below that accurately describe what the Constitution did.
    15·1 answer
  • The first crusades was completed by?
    5·2 answers
  • The arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union began when
    8·2 answers
  • Match the person to the correct biographical information.
    6·1 answer
  • What were statues in a temple<br> called<br> On the ancient Egypt?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!