Rose argued that the last part of a presentation to the VC should be " a wrap-up that leads to the final pitch."
David S. Rose is a prominent angel investor famous for being the founder and Chairman Emeritus of New York Angels.
In one of his entrepreneurship discourses, Rose claimed that the last part of a presentation to the VC should be the overall presentation in a short form that would comprise the main points of the all-around presentation.
Rose concluded that these key points should be the reason to convince a Venture Capitalist to invest in the business.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the last part of a presentation is crucial to convince a Venture Capitalist.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/23471689
The annual interest rate is 11.803%.
Assumptions:
- Interest is compounded annually.
Answer:
Zero-cupon bond= $376,889.48
Explanation:
Giving the following formula:
Face value= $1,000,000
Mature= 10*2= 20 semesters
Market rate= 0.1/2= 0.05
<u>To calculate the price of the bond, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Zero-cupon bond= [face value/(1+i)^n]
Zero-cupon bond= [1,000,000 / (1.05^20)]
Zero-cupon bond= $376,889.48
Answer:
e. content; communications
Explanation:
The website content refers to all multimedia and text found on it. Content should always be relevant and aligned with the company's overall communications plan.
A key part of<u> </u><u><em>integrated marketing communications (IMC)</em></u> is the fact that a company should have all of its media deliver a consistent marketing message. That applies to the website's content and communications too, as it must integrate those factors with other media and platforms. All the media should cover the same topics - company promotions, product innovation or special customer incentives.
<em>Context, commerce </em>and<em> connection</em> are irrelevant terms for the IMC concept.
Answer:
Monopolist can charge a higher price from women.
Explanation:
A monopolist is producing 100,000 units of a product.
The price of the product is $5 per unit.
The price elasticity of demand for men at this price is -3.5.
The price elasticity for women, on the other hand, is -0.8.
This means that the men have a relatively elastic demand for the product. While on the other hand, women have relatively inelastic demand. This implies that if the price is increased the demand from women will not change by a greater proportion.
While demand from men can change to a greater proportion because of a change in price.
In this situation, the firm can charge a higher price from women. This is an example of third-degree price discrimination.
