The statement is true. In the case Feiner v. New York, Chief
Justice Fred Vinson discussed in his opinion that the Court has used the “clear
and present danger” principle. The chief justice believes that the arrest of
Feiner was necessary in order to protect “the interest of the community in
maintaining peace and order on its streets”.
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
Answer:
need for freedom of religion
Answer:
The universe doesn't give a thing about you, but I do
Explanation:
LOLLL thanks for the free points ;)
