All of the above were done by most Democrats throughout the Jackson administration, with the exception of speaking out against the use of the veto.
<h3>What is the legacy of Jackson's presidency?</h3>
The first president was elected by appealing to the majority of voters rather than the party establishment: Andrew Jackson. He established the rule that states are not allowed to flout federal law. He did, however, sign the 1830 Indian Removal Act, which resulted in the Trail of Tears. Politics and the public sphere had always piqued Jackson's interest. He had traveled to Nashville on political business, and in 1796, he was admitted to the convention that wrote the Tennessee state constitution.
To know m ore about Jackson's visit:
brainly.com/question/29445153
#SPJ4
President Nixon was the biggest problem.
Answer:
The third one is properly structured.
Explanation:
Explanation:
Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.
Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.
The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.
Answer:
It will surely be detrimental to governing.
Explanation:
A supported who is appointed as a reward might not have the qualities needed like that of someone appointed based on merit thereby causing problems.
