The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the name of the individual who expresses the argument of liberty. Who are you referring to?
It could be anyone, A politician, a founding father, a diplomat, a freedom fighter, a Patriot. Who?
Trying to help you, we can comment on the following.
Doing some research, there is a concept of Liberty expressed by Federalists Founding Father James Madison in one of the Federalist's Papers. James Madison wrote: "Liberty... is essential to [factions] existence”
What Madison tried to say with that quote was that every faction was the product of a way of thinking, of a political belief system expressed with liberty. And that political factions were the result of the ideas of men who freely decided what could be the best for the country and that is why they formed factions or political parties, to support these ideas and present them to the American people.
A.) Chinese communist leaders worked directly to serve rural peasants. Soviet leaders viewed themselves as guides for urban workers.
Answer:
The Reformation became the basis for the founding of Protestantism, one of the three major branches of Christianity. The Reformation led to the reformulation of certain basic tenets of Christian belief and resulted in the division of Western Christendom between Roman Catholicism and the new Protestant traditions.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
<span>I
think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader
will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the
projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their
aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes
that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its
identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to
gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a
party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political
influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may
(1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great
opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if
arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing
views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.</span>
