Answer:
B) -3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
If [x/2]=0 then x/2 is a number such that the least integer greater than or equal to x/2 is 0. We can rewrite this as the inequality x/2≤0. Then, the value of x in C, D and E is wrong because they are positive numbers, then x/2 would be a positive number which contradicts this inequality.
Now, 0 is the least integer that satisfies this inequality, therefore we cannot have that x/2≤-1 since -1 is an integer and -1<0. Then x/2>-1. This discards A as wrong, because for x=-2, x/2=-1, contrary to x/2>-1.
Thus B is the right answer. To verify, if x=-3/2, then x/2=-3/4 and we have that -1<-3/4≤0 as required.
Answer:
ok so use the degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
x should be 8 + 17 and then multiply the 110 degrees by 8 + 17
The sound wave with a <u>frequency of 20</u> waves/sec is 800 longer than the wavelength of a sound wave with a <u>frequency of 16,000</u> waves/sec
<h3>Calculating wavelength </h3>
From the question, we are to determine how many times longer is the first sound wave compared to the second sound water
Using the formula,
v = fλ
∴ λ = v/f
Where v is the velocity
f is the frequency
and λ is the wavelength
For the first wave
f = 20 waves/sec
Then,
λ₁ = v/20
For the second wave
f = 16,000 waves/sec
λ₂ = v/16000
Then,
The factor by which the first sound wave is longer than the second sound wave is
λ₁/ λ₂ = (v/20) ÷( v/16000)
= (v/20) × 16000/v)
= 16000/20
= 800
Hence, the sound wave with a <u>frequency of 20</u> waves/sec is 800 longer than the wavelength of a sound wave with a <u>frequency of 16,000</u> waves/sec
Learn more on Calculating wavelength here: brainly.com/question/16396485
#SPJ1
Answer:
$0.39:1
Step-by-step explanation:
$0.39:1
Dividing the amount by the cost of the bottles.
The right answer is A ! :)
