Answer:
In our view, when individuals act despite knowing the threat from their acts to the survival and well-being of ecosystems and future generations – for example, from economic activities or from regulatory approval of such activities, which gravely or irreparably imperil the conditions of survival of a given ecosystem – this should constitute a crime against future generations.
So, imagine you had some substance in a bowl. The bowl has a little wall going through the middle, with no openings or anything.
On one side of the wall, there are 100 molecules of the supstance. On the other, there are 10 molecules.
Now, imagine that you make an opening in that little wall that separates the substance into two parts.
Normally, the 100 molecules would start pouring into the part with 10 molecules, or “go down the concentration gradient”, which means going from the part with higher concentration into lower until they are equal.
Going /against/ the concentration gradient is just the opposite — if the 10 molecules went into the side with 100, which takes energy to do.
<span>According
to Reagan, economic policies could cause war and a rise in inflation which
would result in the economy collapsing. Despite those opinions, he claims that
it did more help than harm by bringing about the longest peacetime expansion in
the history of the country. For instance, real family income up, the poverty
rate dropped, entrepreneurship boomed, and new technologies boomed.</span>
What did Chandragupta accomplish? Chandragupta built an empire ranging from the Himalayas and the Kābul River valley in the north and west to the Vindhya Range in the south.
