Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Answer:
insufficient strength of the manipulation
Explanation:
The non-significant results may have occurred because of insufficient strength of the manipulation. Since the variable being tested in this scenario had a very slight difference it caused insignificant results. The variable in the study (light bulb) needs to be drastically different in order for it to have an effect on the subjects and provide results that differ. The 100-watt and 125-light bulb provide almost the same luminosity levels.
Answer:
I had disagreed. I responded to it by calmly stating my opinion towards the point that had been raised and made sure that I didn't offend anyone during me doing so.
A numerical rating that expresses how likely you are to repay your debts.
Answer: Who should select bishops
Explanation:
I took a test on it and got it right
Hope this helps:)
