Let's say we wanted to subtract these measurements.
We can do the calculation exactly:
45.367 - 43.43 = 1.937
But let's take the idea that measurements were rounded to that last decimal place.
So 45.367 might be as small as 45.3665 or as large as 45.3675.
Similarly 43.43 might be as small as 43.425 or as large as 43.435.
So our difference may be as large as
45.3675 - 43.425 = 1.9425
or as small as
45.3665 - 43.435 = 1.9315
If we express our answer as 1.937 that means we're saying the true measurement is between 1.9365 and 1.9375. Since we determined our true measurement was between 1.9313 and 1.9425, the measurement with more digits overestimates the accuracy.
The usual rule is to when we add or subtract to express the result to the accuracy our least accurate measurement, here two decimal places.
We get 1.94 so an imputed range between 1.935 and 1.945. Our actual range doesn't exactly line up with this, so we're only approximating the error, but the approximate inaccuracy is maintained.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. add the side lengths
Answer:
Probly the enviormently agency
Step-by-step explanation:
HOPE THIS HELPS GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
All are divisible by 1.
The number of pieces of card stock which would result upon the process repetition is; 256 pieces.
<h3>What is the number of card stock pieces resulting from the cutting process?</h3>
According to the task content, it follows that since, there are 8 pieces of the 8 inches per side cards initially, the resulting number of cards after carrying out the process of cutting cards into half five, 5 times is;
No of cards = 8 (2)⁵
No. of cards = 256 pieces.
The size of each of the cards in discuss provided that all cuts will be made along and not across the longer edge is; 8 by 1/4 inches.
Read more on exponential functions;
brainly.com/question/14197900
#SPJ1
