Answer:
D. $193,750
Explanation:
Calculation for the wages and salaries in the flexible budget for July
FLEXIBLE BUDGET FOR JULY
Using this formula
Flexible budget= Wages and salaries Cost formula per month+Actual activity press runs*Wages and salaries per press runs+Actual activity book set-ups*Wages and salaries book set-up
Let plug in the formula
Flexible budget=$8,850+201*400+110*950
Flexible budget=$193,750
Therefore the wages and salaries in the flexible budget for July would be closest to $193,750
I believe the answer is: Long Term Care Benefit rider
Long Term Care Benefit rider would obtain a certain amount of benefit if somehow they require direct daily care when unable to provide it for themselves. But the amount of benefit that is given usually would be deducted from the amount of the insured's death benefit.
Answer:
$13,335
Explanation:
Required production in units for April and May are 6,500 units and 6,200 units respectively.
Direct labor hours needed is 0.15 for both months.
Total direct labor hours needed for each month would be;
April
= 6,500 units × 0.15
= 975
May
=6,200 units × 0.15
= 930
Direct labor rate per hour for each months is $7
Total direct labor cost for April would be;
= $7 × 975
= $6,825
Total direct labor cost for May would be;
= $7 × 930
= $6,510
Therefore, total direct labor cost for both months April and May would be;
= $6,825 + $6,510
= $13,335
Answer:
Cutting Department:
Rate variance = 6380*(10.9-11) = -638 Favorable
Time variance = 11*(6380-25000*0.25) = 1430 Unfavorable
Total direct labor cost variance = (6380*10.9)-(25000*11*0.25) = 792 Unfavorable
Sewing Department:
Rate variance = 9875*(11.12-11) = 1185 Unfavorable
Time variance = 11*(9875-25000*0.4) = -1375 Favorable
Total direct labor cost variance =(9875*11.12)-(25000*11*0.4) = -190 Favorable
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
