Answer:
B) fit for the ordinary purpose for which such goods are used.
Explanation:
An implied warranty of merchantability means that the products sold should fulfill an ordinary buyer's expectations and should be fit for the purpose intended.
All products carry an implied warranty of merchantability unless expressly disclaimed or identified as a sale "with all faults" or "as is".
Development, Structure and powers of U.S constitution and Arizona constitution have a huge comparison.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Unlike the United States Constitution, which was embraced in 1787, that wasn't until 1912 that perhaps the Arizona Constitution was accepted, leading to the creation of the 48 states
The common terms,' we the people' all constitutions begin with, but include many different things. After all, there were certain differences between one condition and another for a set of fifty.
The Arizona Constitution states that the legislature must be split into three parts-Legislative, Legislative and executive–which are not applicable to the United States Constitution
Many think of forms to deny or expel someone from office. They will enforce them in both Constitutions. All define the qualifications for their office if they would like to run for office. Another connection that I found was apparent but significant nonetheless.
They both mention the theme of religious liberty, one of the most valuable values in our society. Eventually, both inspire their lawmakers to negotiate with them.
Answer:
a. Counterclaim
Explanation:
Counterclaim is a claim by a defendant (the person be sued) against the plaintiff (the person who sues first).
Lyn is the plaintiff, who first sued Karl (the defendant). Karl's claim against the original plaintiff (Lyn) is an example of a counterclaim.
Another example is counterclaim by the city of Sandy Springs against Holder Construction Group, the company that built the city of Sandy Springs’ new City Springs complex.
Holder Construction Group earlier sued Sandy Springs city over disagreements on payments for the work.
The city filed a counterclaim to a superior Court, claiming that Holder Group should be denied payments until all work is done and for breach of contract, negligent construction and fraud.
Answer:
Option A is the cheapest.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The engineering department estimates costs of $450,000 for the first year. It is estimated that if process and plant alterations are made, the waste treatment cost will decline $43,000 each year. As an alternative, a specialized firm, Hydro-Clean, has offered a contract to process the waste liquids for 15 years for $225,000 per year.
We need to use the following formula and chose the smallest net present value:
NPV= Io +∑ [Cf/(1+i)^n]
Option A:
Io= 407,000
Year cost= 43,000
NPV= 734,061
Option B:
Yearly cost= 225,000
NPV= 1,936,368
False, only shows transactions and amounts owed.