Answer:
Validity
Explanation:
Validity is simply said to the state of soundness and cogency. Being reasonable, factual, true is being valid.
Validity is the state of being legally or officially binding or acceptable.
"It is the state of being authentic and correct.
In research generally Validity is an indication of how sound your research is.
It talks about the design and the methodology of your research. While in Data collection, Validity means that your findings truly represent the phenomenon you are claiming to measure. Valid claims are solid claims.
From the context, the Dr Joslyn's trying to use test scores to predict how many Friends a Child has is simply invalid. Because it lacks validity on all grounds.
One can't deduce the number of friends some has by their test scores.
Answer:
<em>Schizotypal </em>
Explanation:
Schizotypal personality disorder (STPD) <em>is a mental illness distinguished by serious social anxiety, mood dysfunction, emotional lability, derealization, temporary psychotic symptoms, and sometimes bizarre views.
</em>
Generally speaking, they don't know how relations form or how their conduct affects others.
They might also misunderstand the motives and behaviors of others and create substantial mistrust of others.
Because the dinosaur that had that tooth probably ate plants.
The correct answer would be option D, How has the law affected immigration in the United States.
Jamie is writing a research paper on whether to revise the immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. The above mentioned question would be the best example of an effective research question.
Explanation:
When there is a research being conducted, it should cover all the effects, advantages or disadvantages or impacts, the research topic had on a particular area.
When a research like whether to change the immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 is being conducted, the question should be to see how the law has affected the immigration in United States. This question will tell the researcher about the need of any changing in the Act or not.
Learn more about Research Work at:
brainly.com/question/4332567
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
The correct answer is : Sergio is not liable for Sarah's injuries
Explanation:
In this situation in regards to liability, Sergio is probably not liable for Sarah's injuries because he was assuring the contract to be done. Remember that a contract is an agreement between different parties and the responsibilities were set. In this case, Sergio is not responsible for the incident and they didn't agree on injuries, just in mowing.
