Answer:
D) cause the quantity demanded to exceed the quantity supplied of rental housing.
Explanation:
A price ceiling is a binding government regulation in which it puts a cap on the price landlords can charge tenants to rent their properties. If this happens, there could be a rapid significant increase in the demand of apartments. This would lead to excess demand that the existing supply cannot meet , creating a shortage. The property owners may also choose to not rent their apartment at that lower price driving the supply even lower.
Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to determine the standard production costs:</u>
Direct materials= 9.6*4.55= $43.68
Direct labor= 1*15.80= $15.8
Variable manufacturing overhead rate= 3.40*1= $3.4
Predetermined fixed manufacturing overhead rate= 6*1= $6
<u>Finally, the standard cost per unit:</u>
Total unitary cost= 43.68 + 15.8 + 3.4 + 6= $68.88
Answer:
The correct answer is option A ,first mover advantage.
Explanation:
First mover advantage is form of leading strategy where a firm is the first to identify the opportunities hidden in a particular industry or geography,thereby unlocking the potentials in order to improve its financial performance business-wide.
This is a form of diversification, as putting one's eggs in one basket is not a sustainable way to grow the business in the long-term.
Even though there are risks involved in been a first mover, the benefits sometimes outweigh the risks.
In this scenario, Blue Tech Inc.'s failure can be best attributed to <u>"Time compression diseconomies."</u>
We accept time compression diseconomies where the snappier a firm builds up the asset, the higher the improvement cost. We demonstrate that time compression diseconomies normally offer ascent to asset heterogeneity and henceforth upper hand in that one firm builds up the asset quicker than the other. We evaluate the supportability of the upper hand, determine conditions
under which the asset is "incomparable" and demonstrate that firm benefits are nonmonotonic in the degree of time compression diseconomies.
Less than 10% is the percentage of Greek students that would participate in a hazing activity, even if it made them uncomfortable. This percentage is justifiable because student participation in hazing activities is prohibited and the accompanying danger to physical and mental health induced to a student is one factor that makes it more off-putting.