Answer:
1. Tighten the laces of your shoes. Stretch them out and make sure that the tightness of your shoes is comfortable for you.
2. Intersect the laces at their middle, one on top of the other.
3. Bend the top lace down into the small triangle the overlapped laces have formed. Pull the top lace through.
4. Grab the edges of the laces and pull them. Make sure that the tightness of your shoes is comfortable for you. This creates a knot.
5. Take one lace. Bend it at one-third (1/3) the distance from the plastic end to the part at the knot. This should create a teardrop shape.
6. Repeat step 5 with the other lace.
7. Still holding on to the teardrop-shaped laces, overlap them.
8. Bend the top teardrop down into the small triangle the overlapped laces have formed. Pull the top lace through.
9. Grab the edges of the laces and pull them. Make sure that the tightness of your shoes is comfortable for you. This creates a knot.
10. Repeat steps 8 and 9 for a more sturdy knot.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Egg Yolk
Explanation:
The main emulsifying agent is lecithin.
The best answer choice here is A.
A symbol is used to represent and convey emotions or ideas without using a direct example. Usually they make objects or characters stand for something, or symbolize something they are trying to convey.
In Greek mythology, Midas is a king obsessed with wealth. He asks the gods for the ability to turn anything he touches to gold. The gods grant his wish, and Midas soon realizes this gift is actually a curse. Chesterton uses the story of Midas as an analogy for chasing materialistic success. Much as the authors worship material wealth and pursue it as if it were attainable, Midas learns that his new ability doesn’t help him succeed because it prevents him from performing necessary tasks such as eating. Chesterton reminds readers of the obvious moral of Midas's story and shows that authors who write about success often misinterpret Midas's story—sometimes by using phrases such as "the Midas touch" in a positive light.
Chesterton emphasizes that King Midas is an example of foolishness and failure. He implies that, for the same reason, writers who encourage people to chase material success share Midas's foolishness:
We all know of such men. We are ever meeting or reading about such persons who turn everything they touch into gold. Success dogs their very footsteps. Their life's pathway leads unerringly upwards. They cannot fail.
Unfortunately, however, Midas could fail; he did. His path did not lead unerringly upward. He starved because whenever he touched a biscuit or a ham sandwich it turned to gold. That was the whole point of the story . . .
