I believe that the option that describes the author at this point in his life is that he is too young and naive to truly understand what is happening.
The author is sitting and thinking about the world he is living in - about the exile of Jews and how an important historic event that is. He still doesn't understand the horrors that it entails - he is not afraid, but rather curious as to what is going to happen next.
Answer:
Down Below
Explanation:
This is satire because the internet was not around during Abraham Lincoln. He never said that "quote"
Comparison between Beowulf and Grendel which is most accurate is In the poem, Grendel seems like a heartless monster, but in the novel, he is emotionally complex.
Grendel is portrayed as the pure evil in the poem Beowulf. He is a pure evil by killing his loved ones and bring bad things and portrays him s someone who needs to be killed. In Grendel, a novel by John Gardner, the monster is shown emotionally complex by bringing good through his evil actions, for instance, his poetry and art. We figure out through the characteristics of Grendel that he has a problem with the place he is in and with the universe. He had constructed his own theory of life, everything is the product of own perception and that he exists alone until he encountered Beowulf. Grendel portray itself as an evil to make us understand that how we take things for granted like what is our purpose? who we are? whether we are on the right path? Hence, we tend to perform according to the society about what it feels to be good. Hence, we defy our own recognition and creates a monster within us.
Answer:
Create operational definitions of the variables she wants to study
Explanation:
Natasha's professor wants her to create operational definitions of the variable terms in the research that she wants to study. This is evident by the question he asked, ' what do you mean exactly by similarity and attraction'. In research, operational definition means assigning a meaning to the variable of study or interest. She has to define these terms in a way that they are observable and measurable.
The correct answer is option D: challenging assumptions.
Jennifer clearly shows the technique of challenging assumptions, as she tries to challenge her interlocutor. She wants to make him think new ideas based on new perspectives that could be obtained from the use of this technique.
The aim of this discussion technique is to create new thinking habits. Thus, it can help to create new solutions on a given topic.