The phrase in the excerpt from a 1964 interview with Malcolm X indicates that he is explicitly stating an opinion is this "<span>{I don't think that it} serves any purpose for the {leaders of our people} to waste their time fighting each other needlessly."</span>
I think it would be likely. Britain is a country that is well-developed and has a decent military. If you are referring to war in London or other big cities, I think the armies would try to keep warfare on the battlefield, not urban areas. However, to counter that, (correct me if I'm wrong), I believe London is on the water, so a type of naval invasion would be likely. It also depends on who the fighters are. Britain v. U.S.A. for example, evacuations of cities would begin, and it's likely we'd see another Refugee Crisis like the one happening now in Europe, but smaller. But the U.K is part of the U.N., a huge group of unified countries. If war were to break out, it's likely forces would be pushed out easily with the help of other powers/countries.
Answer: Interpersonal communication is the answer to the question.
Answer:
The English built a small fort on a small island off the coast of Virginia. The Aquascogoc, a Native American tribe, showed little interest in building relations with the English. Eventually, the English burned down the tribe's village after an argument over a stolen silver cup.
Explanation:
-
